Generative <scp>AI</scp> in the Care of Older Adults: A Position Statement From the American Geriatrics Society

BACKGROUND: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), particularly large language models (LLMs), is being integrated into healthcare documentation, decision support, patient education, administrative workflows, and emerging agentic systems capable of initiating clinical and operational actions. While GenAI may reduce clinician burden and support person-centered care, it also introduces risks such as misinformation, algorithmic bias, privacy harms, errors of omission, and automation over-reliance. These risks may be amplified for older adults because core geriatrics care tasks, such as goals-of-care discussions, capacity-sensitive consent, polypharmacy and deprescribing, and functional and cognitive assessment in the setting of multimorbidity, may be underrepresented in training data and are high-stakes in practice. METHODS: The American Geriatrics Society (AGS) convened an interdisciplinary working and writing group, reviewed relevant literature and reports, incorporated input from multiple AGS committees, and completed review and approval through AGS committee processes in March 2026. RESULTS: This AGS position statement translates core geriatrics principles, person-centered care, equity, shared decision-making, and promoting independence into actionable recommendations for clinicians, health systems, developers, policymakers, older adults, and care partners. Recommendations address ethical use, clinical integration and oversight, transparency and documentation, privacy protections, governance across the AI lifecycle, including pre, during, and post-deployment monitoring and accountability, and priority geriatrics use cases. CONCLUSION: GenAI should augment, not replace, clinical judgment and relational care. Responsible use in geriatrics requires transparency, clinician-in-the-loop oversight, validation in older adult populations using age-relevant outcomes, and governance safeguards to protect dignity, safety, and equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Published
2026-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70566
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Generative AI in the Care of Older Adults: A Position Statement From the American Geriatrics Society

Neela K. Patel, Stephanie Nothelle, Peter Abadir, Shivani K. Jindal et al.
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Generative AI in the Care of Older Adults: A Position Statement From the American Geriatrics Society

Neela K. Patel, Stephanie Nothelle, Peter Abadir, Shivani K. Jindal, Ardeshir Z. Hashmi, Juliessa M. Pavon, Ankur Bharija, Aruna V. Josyula, William Hung, Ariba Khan, Mark Dredze
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), particularly large language models (LLMs), is being integrated into healthcare documentation, decision support, patient education, administrative workflows, and emerging agentic systems capable of initiating clinical and operational actions. While GenAI may reduce clinician burden and support person-centered care, it also introduces risks such as misinformation, algorithmic bias, privacy harms, errors of omission, and automation over-reliance. These risks may be amplified for older adults because core geriatrics care tasks, such as goals-of-care discussions, capacity-sensitive consent, polypharmacy and deprescribing, and functional and cognitive assessment in the setting of multimorbidity, may be underrepresented in training data and are high-stakes in practice. METHODS: The American Geriatrics Society (AGS) convened an interdisciplinary working and writing group, reviewed relevant literature and reports, incorporated input from multiple AGS committees, and completed review and approval through AGS committee processes in March 2026. RESULTS: This AGS position statement translates core geriatrics principles, person-centered care, equity, shared decision-making, and promoting independence into actionable recommendations for clinicians, health systems, developers, policymakers, older adults, and care partners. Recommendations address ethical use, clinical integration and oversight, transparency and documentation, privacy protections, governance across the AI lifecycle, including pre, during, and post-deployment monitoring and accountability, and priority geriatrics use cases. CONCLUSION: GenAI should augment, not replace, clinical judgment and relational care. Responsible use in geriatrics requires transparency, clinician-in-the-loop oversight, validation in older adult populations using age-relevant outcomes, and governance safeguards to protect dignity, safety, and equity.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Aurora Health Care (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), Duke University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), American Geriatrics Society (US), Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders (US), NeuroMetrix (United States) (US), University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.