DPSF: A Dynamic Patch Shape Selection Framework for Cross-Model Transferable Adversarial Attacks

Adversarial patch attacks are core tools to evaluate adversarial robustness in remote sensing image classification, yet existing methods with fixed patch shapes and single-model optimization yield poor cross-architecture black-box transferability. This paper proposes the Dynamic Patch Shape Selection Framework (DPSF), which integrates a 12-shape patch library, adaptive category matching and multi-model joint optimization with dynamic weight adjustment under a strict 2% patch area constraint. We test DPSF on the UC Merced dataset over eight random split seeds, taking ResNet101, DenseNet161 and VGG19 as held-out black-box models. Under the five-source protocol, DPSF-full achieves mean accuracy drop (ACCD) of 0.380 ± 0.034, adversarial accuracy (Adv Acc) 0.593 ± 0.039, attack success rate (ASR) 0.393 ± 0.037 (on clean-correct test samples, averaged over held-out evaluators), union success rate (USR) 0.581 ± 0.046, and intersection success rate (ISR) 0.188 ± 0.023. With the ResNet50 single-source setting, DPSF-single obtains mean ACCD = 0.275 ± 0.109, surpassing Sparse-RS (0.033 ± 0.012) and Cross-shaped adversarial patch attack (CSPA) (0.232 ± 0.029). Supplementary results on CIFAR-10, Tiny-ImageNet and Mini-ImageNet illustrate cross-scale transfer trends. This work builds a reproducible digital-domain robustness benchmark for aerial land-use scene classification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18142426
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DPSF: A Dynamic Patch Shape Selection Framework for Cross-Model Transferable Adversarial Attacks

Haosu Zhang, Bingshu Wang, Han Zhang, Laixian Zhang et al.
Remote Sensing
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
article

DPSF: A Dynamic Patch Shape Selection Framework for Cross-Model Transferable Adversarial Attacks

Haosu Zhang, Bingshu Wang, Han Zhang, Laixian Zhang, Boqi Huang, Aihong Shangguan
article en

Abstract

Adversarial patch attacks are core tools to evaluate adversarial robustness in remote sensing image classification, yet existing methods with fixed patch shapes and single-model optimization yield poor cross-architecture black-box transferability. This paper proposes the Dynamic Patch Shape Selection Framework (DPSF), which integrates a 12-shape patch library, adaptive category matching and multi-model joint optimization with dynamic weight adjustment under a strict 2% patch area constraint. We test DPSF on the UC Merced dataset over eight random split seeds, taking ResNet101, DenseNet161 and VGG19 as held-out black-box models. Under the five-source protocol, DPSF-full achieves mean accuracy drop (ACCD) of 0.380 ± 0.034, adversarial accuracy (Adv Acc) 0.593 ± 0.039, attack success rate (ASR) 0.393 ± 0.037 (on clean-correct test samples, averaged over held-out evaluators), union success rate (USR) 0.581 ± 0.046, and intersection success rate (ISR) 0.188 ± 0.023. With the ResNet50 single-source setting, DPSF-single obtains mean ACCD = 0.275 ± 0.109, surpassing Sparse-RS (0.033 ± 0.012) and Cross-shaped adversarial patch attack (CSPA) (0.232 ± 0.029). Supplementary results on CIFAR-10, Tiny-ImageNet and Mini-ImageNet illustrate cross-scale transfer trends. This work builds a reproducible digital-domain robustness benchmark for aerial land-use scene classification.

Remote SensingVol. 18(14)
Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Xi'an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics (CN), Space Engineering University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientists of Shanxi Province
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.