Work, Sex, and Substances: Differences in Self-Reported Chemsex Behaviors Between MSM Sex Workers and Digital Content Creators

Abstract Background Chemsex, the use of psychoactive substances to enhance sexual activity, may vary by occupational context. This study compared its prevalence, substance-specific patterns, and acquisition behaviors among two groups: male sex workers who have sex with men (MSM) and MSM who create sexually explicit digital content. Methods Cross-sectional web-based survey of HIV-negative U.S. MSM (N = 769) with verified platform profiles. Group differences were assessed using chi-square tests with Benjamini–Hochberg correction, and independent associations were examined using multivariable logistic regression. Results Sex workers reported higher prevalence of criminalized or controlled psychoactive substance use in occupational contexts than digital content creators (47.7% vs. 21.6%), with occupational group emerging as the strongest independent predictor of use (aOR = 3.36, 95% CI 2.41–4.69). Sex workers also reported greater use of poppers and erectile dysfunction medications more frequently obtained through unregulated acquisition channels. Conclusions Occupational context shapes distinct chemsex use profiles among MSM, underscoring the need for occupation-sensitive harm reduction and clinical outreach. Policy Implications MSM sex workers and digital content creators represent occupationally distinct populations with divergent substance use profiles. Harm reduction, clinical screening, and outreach should be tailored to the risk environments and substances characteristic of each group, rather than treating all MSM engaged in sexual labor as a single, undifferentiated population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexuality Research and Social Policy
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-026-01392-9
Primary Topic
Sex work and related issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Work, Sex, and Substances: Differences in Self-Reported Chemsex Behaviors Between MSM Sex Workers and Digital Content Creators

Starr Tomlinson, Glenn‐Milo Santos, Martha M. Whitfield, Kristopher J. Jackson
Sexuality Research and Social Policy
Sex work and related issues
article

Work, Sex, and Substances: Differences in Self-Reported Chemsex Behaviors Between MSM Sex Workers and Digital Content Creators

Starr Tomlinson, Glenn‐Milo Santos, Martha M. Whitfield, Kristopher J. Jackson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Chemsex, the use of psychoactive substances to enhance sexual activity, may vary by occupational context. This study compared its prevalence, substance-specific patterns, and acquisition behaviors among two groups: male sex workers who have sex with men (MSM) and MSM who create sexually explicit digital content. Methods Cross-sectional web-based survey of HIV-negative U.S. MSM (N = 769) with verified platform profiles. Group differences were assessed using chi-square tests with Benjamini–Hochberg correction, and independent associations were examined using multivariable logistic regression. Results Sex workers reported higher prevalence of criminalized or controlled psychoactive substance use in occupational contexts than digital content creators (47.7% vs. 21.6%), with occupational group emerging as the strongest independent predictor of use (aOR = 3.36, 95% CI 2.41–4.69). Sex workers also reported greater use of poppers and erectile dysfunction medications more frequently obtained through unregulated acquisition channels. Conclusions Occupational context shapes distinct chemsex use profiles among MSM, underscoring the need for occupation-sensitive harm reduction and clinical outreach. Policy Implications MSM sex workers and digital content creators represent occupationally distinct populations with divergent substance use profiles. Harm reduction, clinical screening, and outreach should be tailored to the risk environments and substances characteristic of each group, rather than treating all MSM engaged in sexual labor as a single, undifferentiated population.

Sexuality Research and Social Policy
University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), San Francisco AIDS Foundation (US), Unity Health System (US), University of California San Francisco Medical Center (US)
National Institutes of Health, Center for AIDS Research, University of Washington, University of California, San Francisco
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sex work and related issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.