Ouroboration: Recursive Provenance Loss and False Corroboration in AI-Mediated Information Systems

This concept note proposes “Ouroboration” as a provisional term for a recursive information process in which AI-generated claims, expressions, biases, or errors are reintroduced into prompts, search results, citations, datasets, or other AI systems; their common provenance and dependency relations become obscured; and derivative materials are consequently treated as if they provided independent corroboration. The proposed construct is defined by four necessary conditions: AI-mediated origin, recursive re-entry, provenance opacity, and pseudo-independence. Increased belief, authority, persistence, normalization, or error amplification are treated as possible outcomes rather than defining conditions. The note distinguishes ouroboration from model collapse, model autophagy, circular reporting, citogenesis, and the illusion of consensus, and presents falsifiable propositions and a pilot experimental design. This is a dated, citable concept proposal, not a claim that the term is already established or academically accepted.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21481479
Primary Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ouroboration: Recursive Provenance Loss and False Corroboration in AI-Mediated Information Systems

Jiseok Choi
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Scientific Computing and Data Management
article

Ouroboration: Recursive Provenance Loss and False Corroboration in AI-Mediated Information Systems

Jiseok Choi
article en

Abstract

This concept note proposes “Ouroboration” as a provisional term for a recursive information process in which AI-generated claims, expressions, biases, or errors are reintroduced into prompts, search results, citations, datasets, or other AI systems; their common provenance and dependency relations become obscured; and derivative materials are consequently treated as if they provided independent corroboration. The proposed construct is defined by four necessary conditions: AI-mediated origin, recursive re-entry, provenance opacity, and pseudo-independence. Increased belief, authority, persistence, normalization, or error amplification are treated as possible outcomes rather than defining conditions. The note distinguishes ouroboration from model collapse, model autophagy, circular reporting, citogenesis, and the illusion of consensus, and presents falsifiable propositions and a pilot experimental design. This is a dated, citable concept proposal, not a claim that the term is already established or academically accepted.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Scientific Computing and Data Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.