Physics vs. AI in weather prediction: evaluating GraphCast, AIFS, and FuXi against an observation-corrected WRF model for flash floods

Abstract. Data-driven artificial intelligence (AI) weather models are increasingly positioned as alternatives or complements to physics-based numerical weather prediction (NWP) systems, yet systematic model evaluation studies that compare both paradigms under controlled experimental conditions remain limited. Here we present a structured model evaluation framework applying standardised verification metrics to assess a regional WRF configuration against three publicly available AI models – GraphCast, AIFS Single 1.0, and FuXi – over three high-impact flood events in Luxembourg and the Greater Region (2016, 2018, and 2021), comprising 90 simulation days and over 7300 matched forecast-observation pairs. The WRF model employs a three-dimensional variational (3D-VAR) data assimilation scheme ingesting GNSS Zenith Total Delay and conventional observations on a 6-hourly Rapid Update Cycle. All systems are initialised from ERA5 reanalysis to ensure consistent initial conditions. Categorical precipitation scores at the 1 mm threshold and continuous temperature metrics at surface stations serve as verification targets. Data assimilation measurably improves WRF's categorical precipitation skill (Critical Success Index: 0.306 to 0.341) while leaving near-surface temperature largely unchanged, demonstrating the value of the assimilation scheme. AIFS achieves the highest detection rate (POD 0.765) and net categorical skill (CSI 0.370), GraphCast and AIFS reduce temperature RMSE by ~10 % relative to assimilated WRF, and WRF alone reproduces the observed mesoscale precipitation structure of the catastrophic July 2021 flood. The per-event breakdown reveals no skill degradation for AI models on out-of-sample events, suggesting that meteorological regime rather than training-data overlap governs model performance. These results provide a replicable model evaluation methodology for benchmarking emerging data-driven NWP systems against observation-corrected regional models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscientific model development
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-9831-2026
Primary Topic
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physics vs. AI in weather prediction: evaluating GraphCast, AIFS, and FuXi against an observation-corrected WRF model for flash floods

Felix Norman Teferle, Haseeb ur Rehman
Geoscientific model development
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
article

Physics vs. AI in weather prediction: evaluating GraphCast, AIFS, and FuXi against an observation-corrected WRF model for flash floods

Felix Norman Teferle, Haseeb ur Rehman
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Data-driven artificial intelligence (AI) weather models are increasingly positioned as alternatives or complements to physics-based numerical weather prediction (NWP) systems, yet systematic model evaluation studies that compare both paradigms under controlled experimental conditions remain limited. Here we present a structured model evaluation framework applying standardised verification metrics to assess a regional WRF configuration against three publicly available AI models – GraphCast, AIFS Single 1.0, and FuXi – over three high-impact flood events in Luxembourg and the Greater Region (2016, 2018, and 2021), comprising 90 simulation days and over 7300 matched forecast-observation pairs. The WRF model employs a three-dimensional variational (3D-VAR) data assimilation scheme ingesting GNSS Zenith Total Delay and conventional observations on a 6-hourly Rapid Update Cycle. All systems are initialised from ERA5 reanalysis to ensure consistent initial conditions. Categorical precipitation scores at the 1 mm threshold and continuous temperature metrics at surface stations serve as verification targets. Data assimilation measurably improves WRF's categorical precipitation skill (Critical Success Index: 0.306 to 0.341) while leaving near-surface temperature largely unchanged, demonstrating the value of the assimilation scheme. AIFS achieves the highest detection rate (POD 0.765) and net categorical skill (CSI 0.370), GraphCast and AIFS reduce temperature RMSE by ~10 % relative to assimilated WRF, and WRF alone reproduces the observed mesoscale precipitation structure of the catastrophic July 2021 flood. The per-event breakdown reveals no skill degradation for AI models on out-of-sample events, suggesting that meteorological regime rather than training-data overlap governs model performance. These results provide a replicable model evaluation methodology for benchmarking emerging data-driven NWP systems against observation-corrected regional models.

Geoscientific model developmentVol. 19(19)
University of Luxembourg (LU)
Université du Luxembourg, DeepMind, Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.