Preconception Health Research Priorities for Adolescents and Young Adults in Australia

BACKGROUND: Guidelines on pre-pregnancy counselling are primarily clinical, and although recommendations and policy documents on preconception care exist in Australia, they place little or no emphasis on the preconception health of adolescents and young adults. OBJECTIVE: To identify and prioritise unanswered questions and evidence uncertainties concerning preconception health needs of adolescents and young adults residing in Australia. DESIGN: Research priority exercise. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants included young interest-holders (18-24 years) and professional interest-holders from the academic, healthcare, policy, community and government sectors residing in Australia. METHODS: James Lind Alliance (JLA) methodology was followed to identify research priorities for preconception health of adolescents and young adults. The process was led by a multidisciplinary steering committee comprising young interest-holders and professional interest-holders (including academics and clinicians). A rapid literature review was conducted, from which 80 research questions were developed across 10 domains, which were refined through consultation and prioritised via two rounds of online surveys on Qualtrics using a 9-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The participants included 14 young interest-holders in each survey round, with 22 professional interest-holders in the first round and 30 in the second. Participants from across Australia participated in the survey, but most were from South Australia. In the first survey round, 28 questions across seven domains were prioritised by both professional and young interest-holders. This was followed by a reprioritisation exercise, resulting in the final top 10 research questions spanning five domains. The highest-priority research questions identified by the interest-holders concentrated in the domains of violence and mental health; early intervention and prevention; smoking, tobacco, alcohol, and substance use; access to preconception care and the healthcare system; and priority populations. CONCLUSION: The study identified the top 10 priority research questions informed by professional and young interest-holders. It promotes new research and collaboration while offering guidance on future research investments and on designing preconception interventions for adolescents and young adults in Australia. Turning these priorities into research could improve the health outcomes for adolescents and their future generations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Expectations
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70950
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preconception Health Research Priorities for Adolescents and Young Adults in Australia

Jacqueline Anne Boyle, Keeth L. B. Mayakaduwage, Danielle Mazza, Zohra S Lassi et al.
1 links
Health Expectations
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Preconception Health Research Priorities for Adolescents and Young Adults in Australia

Jacqueline Anne Boyle, Keeth L. B. Mayakaduwage, Danielle Mazza, Zohra S Lassi, Jodie Avery, Gizachew Assefa Tessema, Zahra Ali Padhani, Salima Moez Meherali, Sara Ataie-Ashtiani
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines on pre-pregnancy counselling are primarily clinical, and although recommendations and policy documents on preconception care exist in Australia, they place little or no emphasis on the preconception health of adolescents and young adults. OBJECTIVE: To identify and prioritise unanswered questions and evidence uncertainties concerning preconception health needs of adolescents and young adults residing in Australia. DESIGN: Research priority exercise. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Participants included young interest-holders (18-24 years) and professional interest-holders from the academic, healthcare, policy, community and government sectors residing in Australia. METHODS: James Lind Alliance (JLA) methodology was followed to identify research priorities for preconception health of adolescents and young adults. The process was led by a multidisciplinary steering committee comprising young interest-holders and professional interest-holders (including academics and clinicians). A rapid literature review was conducted, from which 80 research questions were developed across 10 domains, which were refined through consultation and prioritised via two rounds of online surveys on Qualtrics using a 9-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The participants included 14 young interest-holders in each survey round, with 22 professional interest-holders in the first round and 30 in the second. Participants from across Australia participated in the survey, but most were from South Australia. In the first survey round, 28 questions across seven domains were prioritised by both professional and young interest-holders. This was followed by a reprioritisation exercise, resulting in the final top 10 research questions spanning five domains. The highest-priority research questions identified by the interest-holders concentrated in the domains of violence and mental health; early intervention and prevention; smoking, tobacco, alcohol, and substance use; access to preconception care and the healthcare system; and priority populations. CONCLUSION: The study identified the top 10 priority research questions informed by professional and young interest-holders. It promotes new research and collaboration while offering guidance on future research investments and on designing preconception interventions for adolescents and young adults in Australia. Turning these priorities into research could improve the health outcomes for adolescents and their future generations.

Health ExpectationsVol. 29(6)
Flinders University (AU), Curtin University (AU), Eastern Health (AU), Monash Health (AU), Adelaide University (AU), Monash University (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Australian Government, Channel 7 Children's Research Foundation, National Health and Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon