Correlation Between Aortic Valve Area Measured by Cardiac Computed Tomography and Transthoracic Echocardiography in Patients with Aortic Stenosis

Background: Accurate assessment of aortic valve area (AVA) is essential for determining the severity of aortic stenosis (AS) and guiding clinical management. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the standard first-line imaging modality, while cardiac computed tomography (CT) provides direct anatomical planimetry and may offer complementary information in selected patients. Objective: To evaluate the correlation and agreement between CT-derived and TTE-derived AVA measurements and to examine their association with clinical outcomes in patients with AS. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 1,857 consecutive adults with moderate to severe AS who underwent both TTE and cardiac CT at the Rawalpindi Institute of Cardiology between January 2023 and July 2025. Correlation between modalities was assessed using Pearson’s coefficient, while agreement was evaluated with Bland–Altman analysis. Associations between AVA thresholds (≤1.0 cm² vs >1.0 cm²) and adverse clinical outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: The mean AVA measured by TTE was 0.84 ± 0.19cm² and by CT was 0.87 ± 0.21 cm². A strong correlation was observed between the two modalities (r = 0.82, p < 0.001), with acceptable agreement on Bland–Altman analysis. Patients with AVA ≤ 1.0 cm² had significantly higher rates of adverse clinical outcomes compared with those with larger valve areas. Conclusion: CT-derived AVA demonstrates strong agreement with TTE and provides complementary information for severity assessment and risk stratification in patients with aortic stenosis. Integrating CT with conventional echocardiography may improve clinical evaluation, particularly in cases with discordant or borderline findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55729/2000-9666.1634
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correlation Between Aortic Valve Area Measured by Cardiac Computed Tomography and Transthoracic Echocardiography in Patients with Aortic Stenosis

Neeraj Joshi, Jahanzeb Malik, Ali Haider Awan, Abida Perveen et al.
Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Correlation Between Aortic Valve Area Measured by Cardiac Computed Tomography and Transthoracic Echocardiography in Patients with Aortic Stenosis

Neeraj Joshi, Jahanzeb Malik, Ali Haider Awan, Abida Perveen, Muhammad Ammar Ajmal, Shehroz Sultan, Hafsa Malik Aulakh, Bilal Ghafoor, Shabana kauser
article en

Abstract

Background: Accurate assessment of aortic valve area (AVA) is essential for determining the severity of aortic stenosis (AS) and guiding clinical management. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the standard first-line imaging modality, while cardiac computed tomography (CT) provides direct anatomical planimetry and may offer complementary information in selected patients. Objective: To evaluate the correlation and agreement between CT-derived and TTE-derived AVA measurements and to examine their association with clinical outcomes in patients with AS. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 1,857 consecutive adults with moderate to severe AS who underwent both TTE and cardiac CT at the Rawalpindi Institute of Cardiology between January 2023 and July 2025. Correlation between modalities was assessed using Pearson’s coefficient, while agreement was evaluated with Bland–Altman analysis. Associations between AVA thresholds (≤1.0 cm² vs >1.0 cm²) and adverse clinical outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: The mean AVA measured by TTE was 0.84 ± 0.19cm² and by CT was 0.87 ± 0.21 cm². A strong correlation was observed between the two modalities (r = 0.82, p < 0.001), with acceptable agreement on Bland–Altman analysis. Patients with AVA ≤ 1.0 cm² had significantly higher rates of adverse clinical outcomes compared with those with larger valve areas. Conclusion: CT-derived AVA demonstrates strong agreement with TTE and provides complementary information for severity assessment and risk stratification in patients with aortic stenosis. Integrating CT with conventional echocardiography may improve clinical evaluation, particularly in cases with discordant or borderline findings.

Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine PerspectivesVol. 16(4)
Kabul University (AF), East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.