Three Gates to a Quark Generation: An Exact Criterion for Which SU(4) Representations Contain the Standard Model (Part II)

The companion paper (Part I, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21432625) embedded a full Standard-Model quark generation in the dimension-60 representation (3,60) of SU(4) on T²/Z₂ and showed, by an exhaustive scan, that (3,60) is the smallest representation able to do so. This Part II turns that scanned fact into an exact law: which SU(4) representations can hold a quark generation, and why only those. An irreducible representation with Dynkin labels (a,b,c) contains the Standard-Model quark cell {Q(2,1/6), u(1,2/3), d(1,−1/3)} in its T²/Z₂ chiral zero modes if and only if (a+2b+3c) is odd ∧ b≥1 ∧ a+b+c≥3 — an arithmetic condition (the Z₄ centre charge), a geometric one (the middle node of SU(4) excited), and a size one. We derive the criterion by deleting the middle node of the SU(4) Dynkin diagram, exposing a Levi subgroup SU(2)ₗ×SU(2)ₕ×U(1), and projecting the resulting Clebsch–Gordan tower onto the orbifold's chiral zero modes; the projection collapses the tower to a closed-form zero-mode count N = (b+1)(a+c+1)/2. We are explicit about credit: the centre gate is classical, the branching is Littlewood–Richardson, and the midpoint property (the doublet's 1/6 is the mean of the singlets' 2/3 and −1/3) reflects the Pati–Salam hypercharge relation. What is new is the orbifold chiral projection that yields the closed count, the packaged three-gate criterion, and the reading of the ±1/2 cell as the invariant. A node-independence lemma (a simply-laced / Weyl-orbit fact) is included. Finally we place SU(4) in a family: the cell imposes three charge constraints on a hypercharge functional with rank(G)−1 free parameters, so it is a rigid obstruction exactly at rank 3 — SU(4) is the marginal case, and for higher rank a generic representation admits; the same counting explains why a pinned hypercharge in higher-rank models leaves quarks with integer charges and forces them onto a brane. Every count is machine-checked in exact rational arithmetic (SageMath): the criterion is verified against the direct construction on all representations to dimension 900. English and Spanish versions are included, with the exact scripts. The computations were carried out and cross-checked with Claude (Anthropic) as an AI research assistant against a common machine-verifiable ground truth.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21432628
Primary Topic
Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Three Gates to a Quark Generation: An Exact Criterion for Which SU(4) Representations Contain the Standard Model (Part II)

Carmen Muñoz
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
preprint

Three Gates to a Quark Generation: An Exact Criterion for Which SU(4) Representations Contain the Standard Model (Part II)

Carmen Muñoz
preprint en

Abstract

The companion paper (Part I, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21432625) embedded a full Standard-Model quark generation in the dimension-60 representation (3,60) of SU(4) on T²/Z₂ and showed, by an exhaustive scan, that (3,60) is the smallest representation able to do so. This Part II turns that scanned fact into an exact law: which SU(4) representations can hold a quark generation, and why only those. An irreducible representation with Dynkin labels (a,b,c) contains the Standard-Model quark cell {Q(2,1/6), u(1,2/3), d(1,−1/3)} in its T²/Z₂ chiral zero modes if and only if (a+2b+3c) is odd ∧ b≥1 ∧ a+b+c≥3 — an arithmetic condition (the Z₄ centre charge), a geometric one (the middle node of SU(4) excited), and a size one. We derive the criterion by deleting the middle node of the SU(4) Dynkin diagram, exposing a Levi subgroup SU(2)ₗ×SU(2)ₕ×U(1), and projecting the resulting Clebsch–Gordan tower onto the orbifold's chiral zero modes; the projection collapses the tower to a closed-form zero-mode count N = (b+1)(a+c+1)/2. We are explicit about credit: the centre gate is classical, the branching is Littlewood–Richardson, and the midpoint property (the doublet's 1/6 is the mean of the singlets' 2/3 and −1/3) reflects the Pati–Salam hypercharge relation. What is new is the orbifold chiral projection that yields the closed count, the packaged three-gate criterion, and the reading of the ±1/2 cell as the invariant. A node-independence lemma (a simply-laced / Weyl-orbit fact) is included. Finally we place SU(4) in a family: the cell imposes three charge constraints on a hypercharge functional with rank(G)−1 free parameters, so it is a rigid obstruction exactly at rank 3 — SU(4) is the marginal case, and for higher rank a generic representation admits; the same counting explains why a pinned hypercharge in higher-rank models leaves quarks with integer charges and forces them onto a brane. Every count is machine-checked in exact rational arithmetic (SageMath): the criterion is verified against the direct construction on all representations to dimension 900. English and Spanish versions are included, with the exact scripts. The computations were carried out and cross-checked with Claude (Anthropic) as an AI research assistant against a common machine-verifiable ground truth.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.