Embedding Evaluation for Continuous Improvement in a Cohort-Based Doctoral Residency Model: Evidence from an Ed.D. Program

The Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) in Educational Leadership Program at Minnesota State University Moorhead (MSUM) includes two required summer residency weeks that serve as signature components of the doctoral experience. Given their central role in supporting academic milestones and scholarly community, program faculty have embedded systematic evaluation into residency design to support continuous improvement. This article describes a multi-phase, utilization-focused evaluation framework examining residency preparation, implementation, and participant experience. The evaluation designer collaborated with program faculty to design pre- and post-residency week instruments that elevate doctoral student voice and support faculty-led reflection. Preliminary findings indicated strong value placed on peer community, faculty advising, and milestone-aligned sessions, while also identifying opportunities to improve. The article offers a practical model for embedding evaluation to guide iterative improvement in cohort-based doctoral programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Interactive Journal of Global Leadership and Learning
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55354/2692-3394.1088
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embedding Evaluation for Continuous Improvement in a Cohort-Based Doctoral Residency Model: Evidence from an Ed.D. Program

Monica J Weir
The Interactive Journal of Global Leadership and Learning
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
article

Embedding Evaluation for Continuous Improvement in a Cohort-Based Doctoral Residency Model: Evidence from an Ed.D. Program

Monica J Weir
article en

Abstract

The Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) in Educational Leadership Program at Minnesota State University Moorhead (MSUM) includes two required summer residency weeks that serve as signature components of the doctoral experience. Given their central role in supporting academic milestones and scholarly community, program faculty have embedded systematic evaluation into residency design to support continuous improvement. This article describes a multi-phase, utilization-focused evaluation framework examining residency preparation, implementation, and participant experience. The evaluation designer collaborated with program faculty to design pre- and post-residency week instruments that elevate doctoral student voice and support faculty-led reflection. Preliminary findings indicated strong value placed on peer community, faculty advising, and milestone-aligned sessions, while also identifying opportunities to improve. The article offers a practical model for embedding evaluation to guide iterative improvement in cohort-based doctoral programs.

The Interactive Journal of Global Leadership and LearningVol. 4(3)
Minnesota State University Moorhead (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Embedding Evaluation for Continuous Improvement in a Cohort-Based Doctoral Residency Model: Evidence from an Ed.D. Program — Monica J Weir · The Interactive Journal of Global Leadership and Learning (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS