Clinically meaningful risk factors for recurrence in T1 colorectal cancer treated with endoscopic resection alone identified by unsupervised machine learning: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Identifying high-risk patients for recurrence after endoscopic resection (ER) of T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) remains challenging. This study aimed to identify recurrence-risk subtypes and develop an interpretable risk stratification framework. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 1123 patients with T1 CRC treated with ER alone across 27 Japanese institutions (July 2009-December 2016). Patients were divided into development (68%) and evaluation (32%) cohorts based on institutional stratification. K-means clustering was applied to clinicopathological variables to identify recurrence-risk subtypes. A decision tree classifier was subsequently developed to generate transparent risk stratification rules. RESULTS: Three distinct subtypes were identified in the development cohort. Subtype 1 exhibited a numerically higher recurrence rate (5.4%) than subtype 2 (0.9%) and subtype 3 (1.4%). Although subtypes 2 and 3 showed comparable recurrence rates, they were clearly differentiated by morphology (flat vs. polypoid). In the evaluation cohort, subtype 1 continued to show a numerically higher recurrence (4.8%) compared with subtypes 2 (1.6%) and 3 (1.1%). The decision tree model stratified recurrence risk hierarchically: submucosal invasion <1,000μm indicated low risk, whereas invasion ≥1,000μm required morphological assessment, with polypoid lesions classified as high risk and flat lesions further stratified using a 2,000μm threshold. CONCLUSIONS: Three clinically distinct recurrence risk subtypes were identified in T1 CRC following ER, suggesting that morphological subclassification of T1b lesions may refine stratification beyond conventional depth-based criteria. The decision framework offers a preliminary exploratory basis for recurrence risk assessment in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy
Published
2026-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2917-8805
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinically meaningful risk factors for recurrence in T1 colorectal cancer treated with endoscopic resection alone identified by unsupervised machine learning: a multicenter study

Soichiro Ishihara, Masayoshi Yamada, Kazuhiro Sakamoto, Manabu Takamatsu et al.
Endoscopy
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Clinically meaningful risk factors for recurrence in T1 colorectal cancer treated with endoscopic resection alone identified by unsupervised machine learning: a multicenter study

Soichiro Ishihara, Masayoshi Yamada, Kazuhiro Sakamoto, Manabu Takamatsu, Shinobu Ohnuma, Kazutomo Togashi, Kinichi Hotta, Shinji Tanaka, Xin Zhu, Yusuke Saitoh, Shinpei Minami, Xue Zhou, H Ikematsu, K Hashimoto, H Ueno, Y Tamaru, S Nagata, Megumi Ishiguro, Kenichi Sugihara, Koji Komori, Yoshiki Kajiwara, Kenji Matsuda, Shiro Oka, Takashi Okuyama, Kazutaka Yamada
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Identifying high-risk patients for recurrence after endoscopic resection (ER) of T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) remains challenging. This study aimed to identify recurrence-risk subtypes and develop an interpretable risk stratification framework. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 1123 patients with T1 CRC treated with ER alone across 27 Japanese institutions (July 2009-December 2016). Patients were divided into development (68%) and evaluation (32%) cohorts based on institutional stratification. K-means clustering was applied to clinicopathological variables to identify recurrence-risk subtypes. A decision tree classifier was subsequently developed to generate transparent risk stratification rules. RESULTS: Three distinct subtypes were identified in the development cohort. Subtype 1 exhibited a numerically higher recurrence rate (5.4%) than subtype 2 (0.9%) and subtype 3 (1.4%). Although subtypes 2 and 3 showed comparable recurrence rates, they were clearly differentiated by morphology (flat vs. polypoid). In the evaluation cohort, subtype 1 continued to show a numerically higher recurrence (4.8%) compared with subtypes 2 (1.6%) and 3 (1.1%). The decision tree model stratified recurrence risk hierarchically: submucosal invasion <1,000μm indicated low risk, whereas invasion ≥1,000μm required morphological assessment, with polypoid lesions classified as high risk and flat lesions further stratified using a 2,000μm threshold. CONCLUSIONS: Three clinically distinct recurrence risk subtypes were identified in T1 CRC following ER, suggesting that morphological subclassification of T1b lesions may refine stratification beyond conventional depth-based criteria. The decision framework offers a preliminary exploratory basis for recurrence risk assessment in this population.

Endoscopy
Kurume University (JP), Fukushima Medical University (JP), University of Aizu (JP), Wakayama Medical University (JP), Tohoku University (JP), Shizuoka Cancer Center (JP), Hiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital (JP), Asahikawa City Hospital (JP), Hiroshima University Hospital (JP), Tochigi Cancer Center (JP), Takano Hospital (JP), Aichi Cancer Center (JP), The Cancer Institute Hospital (JP), National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP), Juntendo University Hospital (JP), Tokyo National Hospital (JP), Social Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital (JP), Kure Medical Center (JP), Onomichi General Hospital (JP), Institute of Science Tokyo (JP), National Defense Medical College (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP), Dokkyo Medical University (JP)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.