Ten years of accounting for climate change: a systematic review of research progress and future directions

Abstract This study provides a systematic literature review of accounting for climate change research from 2015 to 2024, synthesising and analysing current trends across publications, countries, organisations, journals, and keyword occurrences. Its distinct contribution and novelty lie in introducing a critical theoretical dimension absent in prior reviews, moving beyond descriptive bibliometrics to rigorously examine various theoretical frameworks, such as legitimacy, stakeholder, institutional, and agency theories, that underpin this research. This approach addresses a significant gap by offering a deeper and more nuanced understanding of the motivations and mechanisms behind corporate climate disclosure practices. Employing the PRISMA protocol for screening and VOSViewer for data visualisation, the analysis reveals a notable surge in publications, underscoring the growing scholarly recognition of accounting’s vital role in addressing environmental challenges. By synthesising how these theories explain and advance the discourse, this study provides essential conceptual scaffolding that enriches the field. By integrating theoretical and empirical analyses, it maps the intellectual landscape, identifies critical gaps, and charts an evidence-based pathway for future research and practical applications in climate accounting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-08242-4
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ten years of accounting for climate change: a systematic review of research progress and future directions

Uwalomwa Uwuigbe, Saidu Musa, Olubukola Uwuigbe, Bankole Martins et al.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Ten years of accounting for climate change: a systematic review of research progress and future directions

Uwalomwa Uwuigbe, Saidu Musa, Olubukola Uwuigbe, Bankole Martins, Damilola Eluyela
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study provides a systematic literature review of accounting for climate change research from 2015 to 2024, synthesising and analysing current trends across publications, countries, organisations, journals, and keyword occurrences. Its distinct contribution and novelty lie in introducing a critical theoretical dimension absent in prior reviews, moving beyond descriptive bibliometrics to rigorously examine various theoretical frameworks, such as legitimacy, stakeholder, institutional, and agency theories, that underpin this research. This approach addresses a significant gap by offering a deeper and more nuanced understanding of the motivations and mechanisms behind corporate climate disclosure practices. Employing the PRISMA protocol for screening and VOSViewer for data visualisation, the analysis reveals a notable surge in publications, underscoring the growing scholarly recognition of accounting’s vital role in addressing environmental challenges. By synthesising how these theories explain and advance the discourse, this study provides essential conceptual scaffolding that enriches the field. By integrating theoretical and empirical analyses, it maps the intellectual landscape, identifies critical gaps, and charts an evidence-based pathway for future research and practical applications in climate accounting.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
University of Tasmania (AU), Bowling Green State University (US), University of South Africa (ZA), Covenant University (NG), Majan College (OM), Walter Sisulu University (ZA), Kwara State University (NG)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.