Current concepts of management of anterior cruciate ligament revision in adults

Anterior cruciate ligament revision (ACLRev) remains a complex and demanding procedure. Although an increasing number of studies identified factors associated with graft failure and revision outcomes, clear and practical guidelines are still limited. To address these gaps, the European Society for Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy developed a consensus aimed at standardizing indications for ACLRev. Although this initiative provided important guidance, some questions remain unresolved, such as the optimal graft choice and the management of associated procedures. The aim of this review is to provide an updated overview of current literature regarding preoperative planning, surgical techniques and ACLRev management. ACLRev is currently indicated after previous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction resulting in knee instability, particularly in younger patients with high-functional demands. ACLRev may be performed as a one- or two-stage procedure. A two-stage approach is appropriate in case of infection, arthrofibrosis or insufficient bone stock that precludes secure and anatomical graft fixation. Autografts are generally preferred, particularly in young active patients, due to lower reported failure rates. Increasing attention has been directed to treatment of associated pathologies, such as ramp and root lesions, associated ligamentous instabilities (medial and lateral) or bony malalignment. Additional extraarticular anterolateral procedures are frequently used to reduce failure rates and improve rotational stability. Conversely, the role of slope-reducing osteotomies in ACLRev remains less defined, with good outcomes reported in small case series. Despite the growing body of clinical research, several issues remain unresolved, including the optimal individualized graft selection and indications for combined procedures. This manuscript summarizes the most recent evidence on ACLRev management, with emphasis on graft selection, indications for extraarticular anterolateral procedures, management of medial instability and principles of slope correction. Future high-level studies are needed, particularly addressing peripheral soft-tissue management and osseous corrections, to establish guidelines and enhance clinical outcomes for patients undergoing ACLRev. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Published
2026-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70534
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current concepts of management of anterior cruciate ligament revision in adults

Christian Hoser, Nicolas Pujol, Romain Seil, Jacques Ménétrey et al.
Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Current concepts of management of anterior cruciate ligament revision in adults

Christian Hoser, Nicolas Pujol, Romain Seil, Jacques Ménétrey, Luca De Marziani, Karl Eriksson, Thomas Tischer, Alberto Grassi, Martin Wyman Rathcke, Marco Bonomo, Corrado Bait, Vincenzo Condello, Matthias J. Feucht, Tim Spalding, Sven Scheffler, Marc Strauss, Etienne Cavaignac
article en

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament revision (ACLRev) remains a complex and demanding procedure. Although an increasing number of studies identified factors associated with graft failure and revision outcomes, clear and practical guidelines are still limited. To address these gaps, the European Society for Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy developed a consensus aimed at standardizing indications for ACLRev. Although this initiative provided important guidance, some questions remain unresolved, such as the optimal graft choice and the management of associated procedures. The aim of this review is to provide an updated overview of current literature regarding preoperative planning, surgical techniques and ACLRev management. ACLRev is currently indicated after previous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction resulting in knee instability, particularly in younger patients with high-functional demands. ACLRev may be performed as a one- or two-stage procedure. A two-stage approach is appropriate in case of infection, arthrofibrosis or insufficient bone stock that precludes secure and anatomical graft fixation. Autografts are generally preferred, particularly in young active patients, due to lower reported failure rates. Increasing attention has been directed to treatment of associated pathologies, such as ramp and root lesions, associated ligamentous instabilities (medial and lateral) or bony malalignment. Additional extraarticular anterolateral procedures are frequently used to reduce failure rates and improve rotational stability. Conversely, the role of slope-reducing osteotomies in ACLRev remains less defined, with good outcomes reported in small case series. Despite the growing body of clinical research, several issues remain unresolved, including the optimal individualized graft selection and indications for combined procedures. This manuscript summarizes the most recent evidence on ACLRev management, with emphasis on graft selection, indications for extraarticular anterolateral procedures, management of medial instability and principles of slope correction. Future high-level studies are needed, particularly addressing peripheral soft-tissue management and osseous corrections, to establish guidelines and enhance clinical outcomes for patients undergoing ACLRev. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion.

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy
University of Freiburg (DE), Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg (LU), Frederiksberg Hospital (DK), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Stockholm South General Hospital (SE), Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria (IT), University Hospital of Geneva (CH), Hirslanden Clinique La Colline (CH), Malteser Waldkrankenhaus Erlangen (DE), Humanitas Castelli (IT), Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli (IT), Oslo Kommune (NO), Universitätsmedizin Rostock (DE), Institute of Sports Medicine and Science (JP), Cleveland Clinic London (GB), Diakonie-Klinikum Stuttgart (DE), Hôpital Paule de Viguier (FR), Centre Hospitalier de Versailles (FR), Gelenkpunkt (AT), Olympic Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.