Distress screening and management for adolescents and young adults: 2022 NCI community oncology program landscape assessment

PURPOSE: Adolescent and young adult cancer patients (AYAs, aged 15-39) are at an elevated risk of experiencing psychosocial distress. Furthermore, most AYAs receive care in community oncology settings where little is known about distress screening and management for AYAs. We examined distress screening at National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) across 100 practices previously identified as AYA-treating. METHODS: Using data from the 2022 Landscape Assessment survey, distress screening and availability of mental health care were evaluated. Univariable and multivariable analyses examined associations between on-site availability of mental health services and AYA-relevant practice characteristics (e.g., Children's Oncology Group affiliation, number of new AYAs annually, AYA program). RESULTS: Nearly all (91%) AYA-treating practices reported routinely screening for distress, with 47% using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer. Additionally, 23% of practices reported they do not have mental health services onsite. Practices treating ≥ 100 new AYAs annually were more than 3 times as likely to have onsite mental health services than practices treating < 100 new AYAs annually in multivariable models (OR = 3.09, 95% CI = 1.04, 9.18; p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Although distress screening was widely conducted in AYA-treating NCORP practices, findings raise concerns about the sensitivity and specificity of measures used and access to onsite cancer-specific psychosocial care. Ultimately, the goal of distress screening is referral for assessment and intervention; referral to off-site services may create access barriers. Future studies should focus on understanding whether those who experience distress can and do access cancer-specific psychosocial care, and barriers to doing so.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2026-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-11009-x
Primary Topic
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distress screening and management for adolescents and young adults: 2022 NCI community oncology program landscape assessment

Jordan Gilleland Marchak, Lingyun Ji, Kristin Bingen, Alexandra M. Psihogios et al.
Supportive Care in Cancer
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
article

Distress screening and management for adolescents and young adults: 2022 NCI community oncology program landscape assessment

Jordan Gilleland Marchak, Lingyun Ji, Kristin Bingen, Alexandra M. Psihogios, SK Parsons, Chandylen L. Nightingale, Karly M. Ingram, Emily V. Dressler, Carol Kittel, Melissa P. Beauchemin, Meghan E. McGrady, Joanna M. Robles, Han-Wei V. Wu, Michael Roth
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Adolescent and young adult cancer patients (AYAs, aged 15-39) are at an elevated risk of experiencing psychosocial distress. Furthermore, most AYAs receive care in community oncology settings where little is known about distress screening and management for AYAs. We examined distress screening at National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) across 100 practices previously identified as AYA-treating. METHODS: Using data from the 2022 Landscape Assessment survey, distress screening and availability of mental health care were evaluated. Univariable and multivariable analyses examined associations between on-site availability of mental health services and AYA-relevant practice characteristics (e.g., Children's Oncology Group affiliation, number of new AYAs annually, AYA program). RESULTS: Nearly all (91%) AYA-treating practices reported routinely screening for distress, with 47% using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer. Additionally, 23% of practices reported they do not have mental health services onsite. Practices treating ≥ 100 new AYAs annually were more than 3 times as likely to have onsite mental health services than practices treating < 100 new AYAs annually in multivariable models (OR = 3.09, 95% CI = 1.04, 9.18; p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Although distress screening was widely conducted in AYA-treating NCORP practices, findings raise concerns about the sensitivity and specificity of measures used and access to onsite cancer-specific psychosocial care. Ultimately, the goal of distress screening is referral for assessment and intervention; referral to off-site services may create access barriers. Future studies should focus on understanding whether those who experience distress can and do access cancer-specific psychosocial care, and barriers to doing so.

Supportive Care in CancerVol. 34(8)
Northwestern University (US), University of Southern California (US), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), Tufts Medical Center (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Emory University (US), East Carolina University (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders (US), Children's Healthcare of Atlanta (US), Wake Forest University (US), Columbia University (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Kaiser Permanente, East Carolina University, University of South Carolina, Northwell Health, National Institutes of Health, Cancer Center, University of Kansas, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.