Diagnostic performance of an artificial intelligence algorithm for detecting pneumoperitoneum on abdominal CT scans

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for detection, segmentation, and volumetric quantification of pneumoperitoneum on abdominal CT scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed and validated a deep learning-based model for automated pneumoperitoneum detection on CT. Multi-center CT imaging series from 2072 patients were collected and randomly divided into training and testing sets at an approximate 7:3 ratio. The external validation set included 214 emergency CT scans collected between April 2022 and December 2024. Diagnostic reports served as the reference standard. Primary outcome included the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Quantitative agreement between AI and reference volumes was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: In the test set (n = 607), the model demonstrated excellent performance: sensitivity 91.4%, specificity 93.1%, and AUC 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.99). In the external validation cohort (n = 214), the model maintained robust performance with sensitivity 84.3% (95% CI: 76.2-90.5%), specificity 89.6% (95% CI: 82.3-94.6%), accuracy 86.9% (81.6-91.2%), PPV 89.2% (95% CI: 81.8-94.3%), and NPV 84.8% (95% CI: 77.1-90.7%). After excluding cases with minimal free gas (<1 mL), the model's sensitivity improved to 96%. AI-derived volumes showed strong agreement with the reference standard (ICC 0.996, 95% CI: 0.994-0.997). CONCLUSION: The AI model attained high diagnostic accuracy for pneumoperitoneum on abdominal CT scans, promising to expedite emergency workflows. KEY POINTS: Question Reliable AI detection of pneumoperitoneum, particularly for small-volume free air, on emergency CT remains an unmet need for rapid and accurate emergency triage. Findings The AI model shows high sensitivity and specificity for clinically relevant pneumoperitoneum volumes, although trace-volume detection on CT scans remains challenging. Critical relevance statement This study evaluates the diagnostic performance and volume-dependent variability of an AI model for pneumoperitoneum detection on CT scans, with the potential to aid emergency radiology workflow prioritization and decision support, though prospective studies are needed to confirm clinical impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights into Imaging
Published
2026-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-026-02348-8
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic performance of an artificial intelligence algorithm for detecting pneumoperitoneum on abdominal CT scans

Pengbo Jiang, Hongliang Sun, Sheng Xie, Tongyin Zhang et al.
Insights into Imaging
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
article

Diagnostic performance of an artificial intelligence algorithm for detecting pneumoperitoneum on abdominal CT scans

Pengbo Jiang, Hongliang Sun, Sheng Xie, Tongyin Zhang, Xuemeng Wu, Haoyu Li, Zhigang Sun, Haoran Du, Peng Wu, Yuwan Hu, Shuya Gao, Dijia Wu
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for detection, segmentation, and volumetric quantification of pneumoperitoneum on abdominal CT scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed and validated a deep learning-based model for automated pneumoperitoneum detection on CT. Multi-center CT imaging series from 2072 patients were collected and randomly divided into training and testing sets at an approximate 7:3 ratio. The external validation set included 214 emergency CT scans collected between April 2022 and December 2024. Diagnostic reports served as the reference standard. Primary outcome included the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Quantitative agreement between AI and reference volumes was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: In the test set (n = 607), the model demonstrated excellent performance: sensitivity 91.4%, specificity 93.1%, and AUC 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.99). In the external validation cohort (n = 214), the model maintained robust performance with sensitivity 84.3% (95% CI: 76.2-90.5%), specificity 89.6% (95% CI: 82.3-94.6%), accuracy 86.9% (81.6-91.2%), PPV 89.2% (95% CI: 81.8-94.3%), and NPV 84.8% (95% CI: 77.1-90.7%). After excluding cases with minimal free gas (<1 mL), the model's sensitivity improved to 96%. AI-derived volumes showed strong agreement with the reference standard (ICC 0.996, 95% CI: 0.994-0.997). CONCLUSION: The AI model attained high diagnostic accuracy for pneumoperitoneum on abdominal CT scans, promising to expedite emergency workflows. KEY POINTS: Question Reliable AI detection of pneumoperitoneum, particularly for small-volume free air, on emergency CT remains an unmet need for rapid and accurate emergency triage. Findings The AI model shows high sensitivity and specificity for clinically relevant pneumoperitoneum volumes, although trace-volume detection on CT scans remains challenging. Critical relevance statement This study evaluates the diagnostic performance and volume-dependent variability of an AI model for pneumoperitoneum detection on CT scans, with the potential to aid emergency radiology workflow prioritization and decision support, though prospective studies are needed to confirm clinical impact.

Insights into ImagingVol. 17(1)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking University (CN), China-Japan Friendship Hospital (CN), United Imaging Healthcare (China) (CN)
National Science and Technology Major Project, National Key Research and Development Program of China, China-Japan Friendship Hospital
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.