Coding regions are rarely predefined in the eukaryotic genomes: a note on simplified models of gene architecture

BACKGROUND: The pedagogical depiction of eukaryotic gene structure seems to assume that coding sequences (CDSs) are predefined in the genome, with transcript diversity arising mainly from exon shuffling. However, whether such "predefined CDS" model is universal remains untested. METHODS: We systematically analyzed seven representative eukaryotic genomes to classify protein-coding genes (PCGs) into four classes based on the positional consistency of CDS start/stop sites. Both strict and loose criteria were applied, followed by cross-species comparisons of genomic feature and functional enrichment. RESULTS: Predefined CDS genes (Class 1) were unexpectedly rare, comprising < 10% of PCGs in most species but exceeding 25% in Drosophila. Class 1 genes displayed more exons, longer CDSs, but minimal splicing isoforms, indicating purifying selection on molecular diversity. Class 1 genes are enriched in housekeeping terms like neuronal and developmental processes, whereas highly variable Class 4 genes (with distinct CDS start/end positions across different transcripts) are associated with fast-evolving processes like metabolism and reproduction. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the pedagogical simplification, our results show that CDSs are rarely predefined in the genome. The differential roles of predefined versus variable CDS architectures may reflect how natural selection balances molecular stability and functional innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Genomics
Published
2026-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-026-13181-0
Primary Topic
Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coding regions are rarely predefined in the eukaryotic genomes: a note on simplified models of gene architecture

Z P Wang, Qi Cao, Yuange Duan
BMC Genomics
Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
article

Coding regions are rarely predefined in the eukaryotic genomes: a note on simplified models of gene architecture

Z P Wang, Qi Cao, Yuange Duan
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The pedagogical depiction of eukaryotic gene structure seems to assume that coding sequences (CDSs) are predefined in the genome, with transcript diversity arising mainly from exon shuffling. However, whether such "predefined CDS" model is universal remains untested. METHODS: We systematically analyzed seven representative eukaryotic genomes to classify protein-coding genes (PCGs) into four classes based on the positional consistency of CDS start/stop sites. Both strict and loose criteria were applied, followed by cross-species comparisons of genomic feature and functional enrichment. RESULTS: Predefined CDS genes (Class 1) were unexpectedly rare, comprising < 10% of PCGs in most species but exceeding 25% in Drosophila. Class 1 genes displayed more exons, longer CDSs, but minimal splicing isoforms, indicating purifying selection on molecular diversity. Class 1 genes are enriched in housekeeping terms like neuronal and developmental processes, whereas highly variable Class 4 genes (with distinct CDS start/end positions across different transcripts) are associated with fast-evolving processes like metabolism and reproduction. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the pedagogical simplification, our results show that CDSs are rarely predefined in the genome. The differential roles of predefined versus variable CDS architectures may reflect how natural selection balances molecular stability and functional innovation.

BMC Genomics
Yantai University (CN), Peking University (CN), Yantai Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Peking University International Hospital (CN), China Agricultural University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Universities Scientific Fund
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.