The interplay of risk and protective factors for psychosocial outcome in women after induced abortion – an interview study from Germany

BACKGROUND: Abortions are one of the most common gynecological treatments worldwide. Although many studies investigate risk factors (RF) for a negative abortion-related psychosocial outcome (APO), less is known about protective factors (PF) and the interplay of RFs and PFs. METHODS: From May to August 2022, we conducted a semi-structured interview study in Germany and interviewed 23 women (21-43 years) who had undergone an elective abortion within the last 12 months, asking them about their experiences, perceived RF, PF and APO. The data was analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: We found three different patterns: The first group of women found the process, especially the legal requirements, stressful but reported a mostly positive outcome with sufficient social support as PF. Women who reported neuroticism-related personality factors as RF sought less social support and more frequently used emotion-focused coping strategies such as self-care and distraction and often showed a mixed outcome. A third group of women experienced intimate partner violence (IPV) and also reported distraction as PF. Regardless, all women who survived IPV reported a negative APO. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of women find the legal requirements (e.g., mandatory counseling, waiting periods) burdensome. At the same time, they offer no benefit to women who find themselves in critical situations such as coercion and domestic violence, which was a major RF. The protection of women who survived IPV should therefore be improved and the access to abortion improved. Further research is needed to include effects on more vulnerable groups such as migrants or queer individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Women s Health
Published
2026-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-026-04668-9
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The interplay of risk and protective factors for psychosocial outcome in women after induced abortion – an interview study from Germany

Samuel Tomczyk, Jennifer Stünkel
BMC Women s Health
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

The interplay of risk and protective factors for psychosocial outcome in women after induced abortion – an interview study from Germany

Samuel Tomczyk, Jennifer Stünkel
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abortions are one of the most common gynecological treatments worldwide. Although many studies investigate risk factors (RF) for a negative abortion-related psychosocial outcome (APO), less is known about protective factors (PF) and the interplay of RFs and PFs. METHODS: From May to August 2022, we conducted a semi-structured interview study in Germany and interviewed 23 women (21-43 years) who had undergone an elective abortion within the last 12 months, asking them about their experiences, perceived RF, PF and APO. The data was analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: We found three different patterns: The first group of women found the process, especially the legal requirements, stressful but reported a mostly positive outcome with sufficient social support as PF. Women who reported neuroticism-related personality factors as RF sought less social support and more frequently used emotion-focused coping strategies such as self-care and distraction and often showed a mixed outcome. A third group of women experienced intimate partner violence (IPV) and also reported distraction as PF. Regardless, all women who survived IPV reported a negative APO. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of women find the legal requirements (e.g., mandatory counseling, waiting periods) burdensome. At the same time, they offer no benefit to women who find themselves in critical situations such as coercion and domestic violence, which was a major RF. The protection of women who survived IPV should therefore be improved and the access to abortion improved. Further research is needed to include effects on more vulnerable groups such as migrants or queer individuals.

BMC Women s HealthVol. 26(1)
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE), Universität Greifswald (DE), University of Rostock (DE)
Universität Greifswald
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The interplay of risk and protective factors for psychosocial outcome in women after induced abortion – an interview study from Germany — Samuel Tomczyk, Jennifer Stünkel · BMC Women s Health (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS