Two Routes to the Same Equation: Kinetic and Statistical-Thermodynamic Derivations of the Classical Drug-Receptor Occupancy Relationship
The familiar hyperbolic relationship between drug concentration [D], drug-receptor dissociation constant (KD), and fractional receptor occupancy (p) expressed as \(p = \frac{[D]}{[D] + K_D}\) is the foundation of quantitative pharmacology, tracing to applications of the law of mass action and to adsorption isotherms. Although this kinetic derivation is widely known, it leaves the physical origin of the equilibrium dissociation constant largely unexplained: KD is usually represented as an empirical ratio of rate constants rather than a quantity with fundamental thermodynamic meaning. Here we present, in a narrative review conceptual synthesis, a second, independent derivation leading to the same equation, but from equilibrium statistical thermodynamics, treating a receptor as a two-state system exchanging ligand with a bulk drug reservoir within the grand canonical ensemble. This approach reproduces the occupancy equation exactly and reveals KD to be a Boltzmann factor, so that ‘affinity’ (1/KD) is fundamentally a free energy of binding that can be decomposed into enthalpic and entropic contributions. It is shown that the kinetic and thermodynamic approaches are linked by the principle of detailed balance, and that the same partition-function mathematics underlies adsorption isotherms. Beyond its pedagogical value, grounding KD in a standard free energy of binding clarifies why affinity differences are not linearly, but exponentially, related to binding energy, and supplies a unifying physical basis for receptor pharmacology, surface adsorption, and ligand-gated molecular switches.
Authors
- Robert B Raffa
Institutions
- Drug Enforcement Administration (US)
- University of Arizona (US)
- Temple University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cureus
- Published
- 2026-07-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.112912
- Primary Topic
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00