Conflict Escalation in Intimate Relationships: An Event-Based Structural Model

Research on intimate partner violence has traditionally focused on discrete aggressive acts and their frequency, with less attention to how appraisal, emotion, and response readiness are organized within specific conflict episodes. This study advances an event-based structural model of conflict escalation in intimate relationships by examining how appraisal processes, negative emotional activation, escalation tendency, and behavioral responding cohere within standardized conflict events. Using a vignette-based survey of 2,702 adults in long-term intimate relationships, participants responded to scenarios involving potentially offensive partner demands. Path analyses tested associations among appraisal components, anger and fear activation, escalation tendency, behavioral responses, and expectations of partner escalation. To explicitly evaluate the robustness of the proposed structural configuration, behavioral responding was modeled in two alternative ways: as differentiated decision and response style components and as a unified ordinal severity index, with the full structural model estimated under both specifications. Appraisal components were positively associated with negative emotional activation, particularly anger, which in turn was linked to escalation tendency and to more confrontational behavioral indicators, whereas fear was not associated with escalation tendency. This differentiation between anger and fear indicates that not all negative emotional activation within conflict events carries the same escalation potential. The overall pattern of associations remained substantively consistent across both behavioral representations. Gender differences emerged in levels of several components, with women reporting higher perceived hurt, anger, and escalation tendency, and men reporting higher compliance. By conceptualizing escalation as a structurally embedded response orientation within conflict events, the study clarifies how event-specific appraisal and emotion relate to both readiness and behavioral expression in intimate partner conflict and highlights anger-focused, rather than globally emotion-focused, targets for de-escalation efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605261463283
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conflict Escalation in Intimate Relationships: An Event-Based Structural Model

David Mehlhausen-Hassoen, Zeev Winstok
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Conflict Escalation in Intimate Relationships: An Event-Based Structural Model

David Mehlhausen-Hassoen, Zeev Winstok
article en

Abstract

Research on intimate partner violence has traditionally focused on discrete aggressive acts and their frequency, with less attention to how appraisal, emotion, and response readiness are organized within specific conflict episodes. This study advances an event-based structural model of conflict escalation in intimate relationships by examining how appraisal processes, negative emotional activation, escalation tendency, and behavioral responding cohere within standardized conflict events. Using a vignette-based survey of 2,702 adults in long-term intimate relationships, participants responded to scenarios involving potentially offensive partner demands. Path analyses tested associations among appraisal components, anger and fear activation, escalation tendency, behavioral responses, and expectations of partner escalation. To explicitly evaluate the robustness of the proposed structural configuration, behavioral responding was modeled in two alternative ways: as differentiated decision and response style components and as a unified ordinal severity index, with the full structural model estimated under both specifications. Appraisal components were positively associated with negative emotional activation, particularly anger, which in turn was linked to escalation tendency and to more confrontational behavioral indicators, whereas fear was not associated with escalation tendency. This differentiation between anger and fear indicates that not all negative emotional activation within conflict events carries the same escalation potential. The overall pattern of associations remained substantively consistent across both behavioral representations. Gender differences emerged in levels of several components, with women reporting higher perceived hurt, anger, and escalation tendency, and men reporting higher compliance. By conceptualizing escalation as a structurally embedded response orientation within conflict events, the study clarifies how event-specific appraisal and emotion relate to both readiness and behavioral expression in intimate partner conflict and highlights anger-focused, rather than globally emotion-focused, targets for de-escalation efforts.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence
University of Haifa (IL)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.