Prevalence and Risk Factors for Gingival Recession and Abrasion in Periodontally Healthy and Diseased Cohort Referred to Dental Teaching Clinic in Baghdad: A Cross‐Sectional Study

ABSTRACT Introduction Gingival recession (GR) is the apical displacement of the gingival margin, while gingival abrasion (GA) is the pathologic wear of gingiva by a foreign substance/object. Both can result in exposure of the root surface and can be associated with sensitivity, caries and compromised aesthetics. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and risk factors for GR/GA among patients referred to the teaching dental clinic in Baghdad. Methods Three hundred and seventy‐two subjects diagnosed with periodontal health, gingivitis, and periodontitis were recruited. Self‐reported demographic parameters including age, sex, smoking, systemic disease, occupation, education, income, brushing frequency and type of toothbrush were recorded. The number of sites with GR and their depth were also recorded. GA lesions were categorised as small (≤ 2 mm), moderate (2–5 mm), and large (> 5 mm). Results The prevalence of GR was 42.1% with significantly greater defect depth in periodontitis cases compared to healthy individuals (3.4 ± 1.4 vs. 2.1 ± 0.9 mm, p < 0.003). The prevalence of GR was highest in lower premolar (22.2%) and maxillary canine (15.5%) sites. Large GA defects (> 5 mm) were most prevalent in periodontitis patients. Adjusted models indicated that hard‐bristle toothbrush use (OR 3.19; 95% CI 1.38–7.38, p = 0.007), presence of periodontitis (OR 12.02; 95% CI 1.83–79.13, p = 0.01), and tooth type (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.30–0.81, p = 0.005) were potential risk factors for GA and were also associated with increasing GR defect depth ( R 2 0.15, p < 0.001). Conclusion GR/GA is a common oral health problem and was independently associated with the use of hard‐bristle toothbrushes, tooth type, and the presence of periodontitis. However, these results should be cautiously interpreted within the context of a single‐centre referral setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Dental Hygiene
Published
2026-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.70134
Primary Topic
Dental Erosion and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Gingival Recession and Abrasion in Periodontally Healthy and Diseased Cohort Referred to Dental Teaching Clinic in Baghdad: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Ali A. Abdulkareem, Philip M. Preshaw, Nada K. Imran, Sarhang Gul et al.
International Journal of Dental Hygiene
Dental Erosion and Treatment
article

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Gingival Recession and Abrasion in Periodontally Healthy and Diseased Cohort Referred to Dental Teaching Clinic in Baghdad: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Ali A. Abdulkareem, Philip M. Preshaw, Nada K. Imran, Sarhang Gul, Ali J. B. Al-Sharqi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Gingival recession (GR) is the apical displacement of the gingival margin, while gingival abrasion (GA) is the pathologic wear of gingiva by a foreign substance/object. Both can result in exposure of the root surface and can be associated with sensitivity, caries and compromised aesthetics. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and risk factors for GR/GA among patients referred to the teaching dental clinic in Baghdad. Methods Three hundred and seventy‐two subjects diagnosed with periodontal health, gingivitis, and periodontitis were recruited. Self‐reported demographic parameters including age, sex, smoking, systemic disease, occupation, education, income, brushing frequency and type of toothbrush were recorded. The number of sites with GR and their depth were also recorded. GA lesions were categorised as small (≤ 2 mm), moderate (2–5 mm), and large (> 5 mm). Results The prevalence of GR was 42.1% with significantly greater defect depth in periodontitis cases compared to healthy individuals (3.4 ± 1.4 vs. 2.1 ± 0.9 mm, p < 0.003). The prevalence of GR was highest in lower premolar (22.2%) and maxillary canine (15.5%) sites. Large GA defects (> 5 mm) were most prevalent in periodontitis patients. Adjusted models indicated that hard‐bristle toothbrush use (OR 3.19; 95% CI 1.38–7.38, p = 0.007), presence of periodontitis (OR 12.02; 95% CI 1.83–79.13, p = 0.01), and tooth type (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.30–0.81, p = 0.005) were potential risk factors for GA and were also associated with increasing GR defect depth ( R 2 0.15, p < 0.001). Conclusion GR/GA is a common oral health problem and was independently associated with the use of hard‐bristle toothbrushes, tooth type, and the presence of periodontitis. However, these results should be cautiously interpreted within the context of a single‐centre referral setting.

International Journal of Dental Hygiene
University of Baghdad (IQ), University of Dundee (GB), Sulaimani Polytechnic University (IQ), University of Sulaimani (IQ), Newcastle University (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Dental Erosion and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.