Appalling Activism: Gender-Based and Racist Violence and an Aesthetics of Disgust in Leïla Slimani and Mithu Sanyal

Abstract Despite its challenging political and aesthetic history, disgust has increasingly functioned as a political tool of audience engagement that intervenes in the acquisition and dissemination of knowledge. Detecting in Chanson douce (2016) by Leïla Slimani and Identitti (2022) by Mithu Sanyal a literary version of disgust, I propose in this article that the depiction of physical, socio-moral and interpersonal repulsion in the two texts can be aligned with the political engagement of the two writers and that they use fiction subversively as a vehicle for their political commentary and intercession. In an analysis primarily of the gender-based and racist violence in the texts, I draw on the work of José Medina and María Lugones to argue that the ambiguity in disgust lends it, in fiction, the potential to reshape socio-political knowledge and thus to function as a tool for what Miranda Fricker calls ‘epistemic justice’.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forum for Modern Language Studies
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/fmls/cqag018
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Appalling Activism: Gender-Based and Racist Violence and an Aesthetics of Disgust in Leïla Slimani and Mithu Sanyal

Matthew Hines
Forum for Modern Language Studies
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Appalling Activism: Gender-Based and Racist Violence and an Aesthetics of Disgust in Leïla Slimani and Mithu Sanyal

Matthew Hines
article en

Abstract

Abstract Despite its challenging political and aesthetic history, disgust has increasingly functioned as a political tool of audience engagement that intervenes in the acquisition and dissemination of knowledge. Detecting in Chanson douce (2016) by Leïla Slimani and Identitti (2022) by Mithu Sanyal a literary version of disgust, I propose in this article that the depiction of physical, socio-moral and interpersonal repulsion in the two texts can be aligned with the political engagement of the two writers and that they use fiction subversively as a vehicle for their political commentary and intercession. In an analysis primarily of the gender-based and racist violence in the texts, I draw on the work of José Medina and María Lugones to argue that the ambiguity in disgust lends it, in fiction, the potential to reshape socio-political knowledge and thus to function as a tool for what Miranda Fricker calls ‘epistemic justice’.

Forum for Modern Language Studies
University of Cambridge (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.