Are dental practitioners prepared to recognize stomatognathic movement disorders? A cross-sectional study of knowledge, diagnostic confidence, and educational needs

BACKGROUND: Stomatognathic movement disorders (SMDs) are uncommon but clinically significant neurological conditions that frequently present with orofacial manifestations. Because affected patients may initially seek care from dental practitioners, limited awareness of these disorders could contribute to diagnostic confusion with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and may have implications for timely referral and appropriate patient management. This study evaluated dental practitioners' knowledge, diagnostic confidence, and educational preparedness regarding SMDs. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among dental practitioners using a validated self-administered online questionnaire. Knowledge scores were calculated out of 25 points and expressed as percentages. Comparative analyses were performed across educational levels using one-way ANOVA, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 156 dental practitioners participated. Mean knowledge scores differed significantly across academic level (Bachelor: 44.05%, Master: 48.95%, Doctorate: 63.71%; p < 0.001). Doctoral-level education independently predicted adequate knowledge (OR = 8.54, 95% CI: 2.09-34.97; p = 0.003), whereas master's-level showed no significant effect. Knowledge gaps were observed in several domains, particularly in distinguishing SMDs from TMDs and in the management of oromandibular dystonia. Only a minority of participants correctly recognized that temporomandibular joint radiographs are not routinely required prior to treatment. Self-reported clinical confidence was generally low, with only 1.1% of general dentists reporting the ability to independently manage suspected SMD cases. Nevertheless, 94.9% of participants supported integrating SMD-related content into dental curricula. CONCLUSION: The surveyed dental practitioners demonstrated important knowledge gaps regarding SMDs. These findings highlight opportunities to strengthen undergraduate and continuing dental education in the recognition, differentiation from TMDs, and appropriate referral of patients with suspected SMDs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BDJ Open
Published
2026-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-026-00470-9
Primary Topic
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are dental practitioners prepared to recognize stomatognathic movement disorders? A cross-sectional study of knowledge, diagnostic confidence, and educational needs

Hana’a Hezam Algadi, Omer Mohammed Jamali, Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi, Mohammed Sultan Al-Ak’hali et al.
BDJ Open
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
article

Are dental practitioners prepared to recognize stomatognathic movement disorders? A cross-sectional study of knowledge, diagnostic confidence, and educational needs

Hana’a Hezam Algadi, Omer Mohammed Jamali, Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi, Mohammed Sultan Al-Ak’hali, Bushra Hussein, Rahma Jamali, Meena Al-sharjabi, Maram Al Riachi, Kholud Abu sanad, Ferdus Zahrah
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stomatognathic movement disorders (SMDs) are uncommon but clinically significant neurological conditions that frequently present with orofacial manifestations. Because affected patients may initially seek care from dental practitioners, limited awareness of these disorders could contribute to diagnostic confusion with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and may have implications for timely referral and appropriate patient management. This study evaluated dental practitioners' knowledge, diagnostic confidence, and educational preparedness regarding SMDs. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among dental practitioners using a validated self-administered online questionnaire. Knowledge scores were calculated out of 25 points and expressed as percentages. Comparative analyses were performed across educational levels using one-way ANOVA, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 156 dental practitioners participated. Mean knowledge scores differed significantly across academic level (Bachelor: 44.05%, Master: 48.95%, Doctorate: 63.71%; p < 0.001). Doctoral-level education independently predicted adequate knowledge (OR = 8.54, 95% CI: 2.09-34.97; p = 0.003), whereas master's-level showed no significant effect. Knowledge gaps were observed in several domains, particularly in distinguishing SMDs from TMDs and in the management of oromandibular dystonia. Only a minority of participants correctly recognized that temporomandibular joint radiographs are not routinely required prior to treatment. Self-reported clinical confidence was generally low, with only 1.1% of general dentists reporting the ability to independently manage suspected SMD cases. Nevertheless, 94.9% of participants supported integrating SMD-related content into dental curricula. CONCLUSION: The surveyed dental practitioners demonstrated important knowledge gaps regarding SMDs. These findings highlight opportunities to strengthen undergraduate and continuing dental education in the recognition, differentiation from TMDs, and appropriate referral of patients with suspected SMDs.

BDJ OpenVol. 12(1)
Sana'a University (YE), Taibah University (SA), Ibb University (YE), Jazan University (SA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.