Digital Justice: Evaluating Grievance Redressal Mechanisms and Consumer Satisfaction in E-Commerce Dispute Resolution

The proliferation of e-commerce platforms in India has engendered a complex landscape of consumer disputes that existing legal frameworks have been slow to address. This paper adopts a doctrinal methodology to examine the statutory, regulatory, and judicial architecture governing grievance redressal in online commerce, with particular attention to the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, the Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules, 2020, and the Information Technology Act, 2000. Through an analysis of legislative text, subordinate legislation, judicial pronouncements, and policy documents, the paper critically evaluates whether the current legal framework adequately ensures efficacious and accessible dispute resolution for consumers transacting on digital platforms. The paper further examines the structural deficiencies in platform-level grievance mechanisms and proposes doctrinal refinements drawing upon comparative jurisprudence from the European Union and the United Kingdom. It concludes that while India has made significant legislative strides, institutional lacunae, enforcement gaps, and the absence of mandatory online dispute resolution (ODR) infrastructure continue to undermine the promise of digital consumer justice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64388/irev10i1-1719686
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Justice: Evaluating Grievance Redressal Mechanisms and Consumer Satisfaction in E-Commerce Dispute Resolution

Gunja Dubey, Dr. Sunil Kumar Mishra
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
article

Digital Justice: Evaluating Grievance Redressal Mechanisms and Consumer Satisfaction in E-Commerce Dispute Resolution

Gunja Dubey, Dr. Sunil Kumar Mishra
article en

Abstract

The proliferation of e-commerce platforms in India has engendered a complex landscape of consumer disputes that existing legal frameworks have been slow to address. This paper adopts a doctrinal methodology to examine the statutory, regulatory, and judicial architecture governing grievance redressal in online commerce, with particular attention to the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, the Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules, 2020, and the Information Technology Act, 2000. Through an analysis of legislative text, subordinate legislation, judicial pronouncements, and policy documents, the paper critically evaluates whether the current legal framework adequately ensures efficacious and accessible dispute resolution for consumers transacting on digital platforms. The paper further examines the structural deficiencies in platform-level grievance mechanisms and proposes doctrinal refinements drawing upon comparative jurisprudence from the European Union and the United Kingdom. It concludes that while India has made significant legislative strides, institutional lacunae, enforcement gaps, and the absence of mandatory online dispute resolution (ODR) infrastructure continue to undermine the promise of digital consumer justice.

Iconic Research and Engineering JournalsVol. 10(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.