Palliative Care Quality Improvement Project: Integrating Palliative Care into Oncology

Objectives: Early palliative-care integration is recognised by the World Health Organization, American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology as an essential component of comprehensive oncology care, yet referral practices in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain inconsistent. At our cancer care department in a private tertiary superspeciality hospital with integrated medical, surgical, radiation oncology and palliative care services, only 7.5% of newly registered patients with Stage IV cancer were being referred to the specialist palliative-care team. The objective of this palliative care quality-improvement project was to raise the referral rate to 25% within the next 6 months through structured, system-level interventions. Materials and Methods: Guided by the National Cancer Grid Enable Quality Improvement in the Patient Care-India programme and the Stanford promoting assessment and improvement of the cancer experience framework, we applied an A3-based Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle. A multidisciplinary team following this methodology refined the problem statement, created a SMART goal, mapped the process using GEMBA walk, performed root-cause analysis using fishbone diagram, formulated key drivers and an impact-effort matrix to prioritise interventions while maintaining a run chart. Key actions included (1) finalising and implementing consensus referral criteria, (2) placing placards in outpatient areas/sending referral criteria on e-mail, (3) ensuring mandatory documentation of treatment intent and referral status in electronic prescriptions and tumour-board reports respectively and (4) bi-monthly compliance audits. The primary outcome was the monthly percentage of patients with Stage IV cancer referred to palliative care, plotted on a run chart from November 2020 to July 2021. Results: During the study period, 537 patients with Stage IV cancer (range 35–72/month) were registered; 66 patients were referred to specialist palliative care (range 4–13/month). In the months of November and December 2020, the baseline referral proportion averaged 7.5%. After sequential implementation of the intervention bundle, referrals rose steadily, and an absolute increase of 10.8% was noted, reaching 18.3% in July 2021 despite pandemic-related limitations. Although the project fell short of its target which was 25%, informal oncologist–palliative-care dialogue and tumour-board documentation of treatment intent and referral status compliance improved. Due to COVID-19-related restrictions, certain activities, e.g. standees, Hindi patient leaflets, could not be implemented. Conclusion: This initiative demonstrates that targeted mentorship, locally tailored referral criteria and seamless workflow prompts, can substantially strengthen palliative care integration in oncology, laying the groundwork for durable culture change and better patient outcomes. Scaling similar QI models across services and institutions will be essential to normalise early palliative care as a core component of high-quality cancer care in LMICs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Palliative Care
Published
2026-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/ijpc_285_2025
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Palliative Care Quality Improvement Project: Integrating Palliative Care into Oncology

Gaurav Chanana, Umesh Velu, Ramandeep Singh Arora, Kamlesh Kumari et al.
Indian Journal of Palliative Care
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Palliative Care Quality Improvement Project: Integrating Palliative Care into Oncology

Gaurav Chanana, Umesh Velu, Ramandeep Singh Arora, Kamlesh Kumari, Harpreet Kaur, MM Sunilkumar, Devavrat Arya, Megha Pruthi, Harit Chaturvedi, Michael Rabow
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Early palliative-care integration is recognised by the World Health Organization, American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology as an essential component of comprehensive oncology care, yet referral practices in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain inconsistent. At our cancer care department in a private tertiary superspeciality hospital with integrated medical, surgical, radiation oncology and palliative care services, only 7.5% of newly registered patients with Stage IV cancer were being referred to the specialist palliative-care team. The objective of this palliative care quality-improvement project was to raise the referral rate to 25% within the next 6 months through structured, system-level interventions. Materials and Methods: Guided by the National Cancer Grid Enable Quality Improvement in the Patient Care-India programme and the Stanford promoting assessment and improvement of the cancer experience framework, we applied an A3-based Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle. A multidisciplinary team following this methodology refined the problem statement, created a SMART goal, mapped the process using GEMBA walk, performed root-cause analysis using fishbone diagram, formulated key drivers and an impact-effort matrix to prioritise interventions while maintaining a run chart. Key actions included (1) finalising and implementing consensus referral criteria, (2) placing placards in outpatient areas/sending referral criteria on e-mail, (3) ensuring mandatory documentation of treatment intent and referral status in electronic prescriptions and tumour-board reports respectively and (4) bi-monthly compliance audits. The primary outcome was the monthly percentage of patients with Stage IV cancer referred to palliative care, plotted on a run chart from November 2020 to July 2021. Results: During the study period, 537 patients with Stage IV cancer (range 35–72/month) were registered; 66 patients were referred to specialist palliative care (range 4–13/month). In the months of November and December 2020, the baseline referral proportion averaged 7.5%. After sequential implementation of the intervention bundle, referrals rose steadily, and an absolute increase of 10.8% was noted, reaching 18.3% in July 2021 despite pandemic-related limitations. Although the project fell short of its target which was 25%, informal oncologist–palliative-care dialogue and tumour-board documentation of treatment intent and referral status compliance improved. Due to COVID-19-related restrictions, certain activities, e.g. standees, Hindi patient leaflets, could not be implemented. Conclusion: This initiative demonstrates that targeted mentorship, locally tailored referral criteria and seamless workflow prompts, can substantially strengthen palliative care integration in oncology, laying the groundwork for durable culture change and better patient outcomes. Scaling similar QI models across services and institutions will be essential to normalise early palliative care as a core component of high-quality cancer care in LMICs.

Indian Journal of Palliative CareVol. 0
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN), University of California, San Francisco (US), Singapore General Hospital (SG), Pallium India (IN), Max Super Speciality Hospital (IN), San Diego Hospice and The Institute for Palliative Medicine (US), Fortis Memorial Research Institute (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.