Eating Disorder Clinician Views About the Impact of Out‐of‐Home Calorie Labelling on Their Patients: A Qualitative Interview Study

OBJECTIVE: Accumulating evidence suggests that people with eating disorders experience mainly negative impacts of out-of-home calorie labelling. This study explored eating disorder clinician perspectives on how such labels affect individuals with eating disorders, and their views on implementation of this policy. METHOD: Semi-structured 1:1 interviews were conducted with 20 eating disorder clinicians from different professional disciplines across adolescent and adult services. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse interview transcripts. RESULTS: Four themes and nine subthemes were generated. Themes were: (1) Reinforcing disordered eating; (2) 'Informed choice'; (3) Managing exposure; (4) Policy recommendations. Clinicians mainly identified negative impacts of calorie labelling, such as facilitating dietary restriction, although they also recognised some positives, such as reassurance. Within treatment, clinicians either shielded their patients from out-of-home calorie labels or facilitated exposure to such labels. Clinicians supported implementation options which promote individual autonomy about whether to view calorie information in out-of-home settings. CONCLUSION: Eating disorder clinicians predominantly describe negative impacts of out-of-home calorie labelling on their patients but also identify positives for some individuals. Findings highlight the importance of clinicians tailoring strategies to individuals' needs based on factors including developmental and recovery stage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Eating Disorders Review
Published
2026-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.70153
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eating Disorder Clinician Views About the Impact of Out‐of‐Home Calorie Labelling on Their Patients: A Qualitative Interview Study

Ulrike Schmidt, Imogen Peebles, Fiona Duffy, Tom Jewell et al.
European Eating Disorders Review
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Eating Disorder Clinician Views About the Impact of Out‐of‐Home Calorie Labelling on Their Patients: A Qualitative Interview Study

Ulrike Schmidt, Imogen Peebles, Fiona Duffy, Tom Jewell, Dasha Nicholls, Abinaya Nadarajah, Ellen Maloney, Nora Trompeter, Helen Sharpe, Lucy Serpell
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Accumulating evidence suggests that people with eating disorders experience mainly negative impacts of out-of-home calorie labelling. This study explored eating disorder clinician perspectives on how such labels affect individuals with eating disorders, and their views on implementation of this policy. METHOD: Semi-structured 1:1 interviews were conducted with 20 eating disorder clinicians from different professional disciplines across adolescent and adult services. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse interview transcripts. RESULTS: Four themes and nine subthemes were generated. Themes were: (1) Reinforcing disordered eating; (2) 'Informed choice'; (3) Managing exposure; (4) Policy recommendations. Clinicians mainly identified negative impacts of calorie labelling, such as facilitating dietary restriction, although they also recognised some positives, such as reassurance. Within treatment, clinicians either shielded their patients from out-of-home calorie labels or facilitated exposure to such labels. Clinicians supported implementation options which promote individual autonomy about whether to view calorie information in out-of-home settings. CONCLUSION: Eating disorder clinicians predominantly describe negative impacts of out-of-home calorie labelling on their patients but also identify positives for some individuals. Findings highlight the importance of clinicians tailoring strategies to individuals' needs based on factors including developmental and recovery stage.

European Eating Disorders Review
NHS Lothian (GB), King's College London (GB), South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, King's College London, Arts and Humanities Research Council, Medical Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.