Balancing sensitivity and helpfulness: how power shapes compassionate communication at work

Leaders are well positioned to respond compassionately to employees’ personal suffering. Not only do leaders shape organizational norms around compassion, they often have instrumental access to resources that help alleviate suffering. But how do leaders know their compassionate efforts alleviate employee suffering as intended given the power dynamics inherent to the relationship? Drawing on communicative approaches to compassion and leadership, the present study investigates this question by examining what compassion recipients perceive as compassionate communication from leaders at work. Based on 31 qualitative interviews, recipients reported that leaders enacted compassion through the divergent messaging dimensions of sensitivity and helpfulness across three key moments in initial compassion conversations. Interestingly, these messaging dimensions are potentially related within compassion conversations between providers and recipients, highlighting the complex nature of communicating compassion at work when power dynamics are present. Our findings advance compassion theory by offering compassion recipients’ perspective of workplace compassion with leaders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Communication Research
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2026.2698131
Primary Topic
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing sensitivity and helpfulness: how power shapes compassionate communication at work

Cris J. Tietsort, Sarah J. Tracy, Elissa A. Adame
Journal of Applied Communication Research
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
article

Balancing sensitivity and helpfulness: how power shapes compassionate communication at work

Cris J. Tietsort, Sarah J. Tracy, Elissa A. Adame
article en

Abstract

Leaders are well positioned to respond compassionately to employees’ personal suffering. Not only do leaders shape organizational norms around compassion, they often have instrumental access to resources that help alleviate suffering. But how do leaders know their compassionate efforts alleviate employee suffering as intended given the power dynamics inherent to the relationship? Drawing on communicative approaches to compassion and leadership, the present study investigates this question by examining what compassion recipients perceive as compassionate communication from leaders at work. Based on 31 qualitative interviews, recipients reported that leaders enacted compassion through the divergent messaging dimensions of sensitivity and helpfulness across three key moments in initial compassion conversations. Interestingly, these messaging dimensions are potentially related within compassion conversations between providers and recipients, highlighting the complex nature of communicating compassion at work when power dynamics are present. Our findings advance compassion theory by offering compassion recipients’ perspective of workplace compassion with leaders.

Journal of Applied Communication Research
University of Denver (US), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Balancing sensitivity and helpfulness: how power shapes compassionate communication at work — Cris J. Tietsort, Sarah J. Tracy, et al. · Journal of Applied Communication Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS