A Multimodal TinyML-Based Predictive Maintenance Architecture for Industrial IoT in the 6G Era

Predictive maintenance (PdM) is central to Industry 5.0 strategies for reducing unplanned downtime in rotating machinery. This work proposes and evaluates, as a proof of concept on a controlled single-machine testbed, a multimodal TinyML edge architecture for PdM designed to remain compatible across the application plane’s evolution toward sixth-generation (6G) networks. Three complementary modalities run local inference on commercial off-the-shelf smart sensor nodes—vibration, acoustic, and thermography—with an embedded gateway bridging per-modality decisions to a serverless cloud back-end. Using real vibration data from a controlled static-unbalance protocol, five anomaly-detection model variants, operating on ten frequency-independent time-domain features extracted from 6 s windows, are benchmarked on the actual Cortex-M4F target; the INT8-quantized fully connected autoencoder, scored by per-window reconstruction error, reaches F1 = 0.9807 with 254 µs inference latency and a 6056 B Flash footprint, well within the microcontroller budget. In a second acquisition session with the remounted sensor, the frozen model retains perfect fault recall, and a short per-installation healthy-baseline recalibration restores F1 = 0.975 without any weight retraining. The acoustic modality is classified in-sensor on log-Mel filterbank energies by the Syntiant NDP120 neural coprocessor, and the thermographic modality by a lightweight binary CNN on 96 × 96 px frames. A preliminary intra-session late-fusion analysis suggests that a logistic-regression meta-learner over the three modality confidence scores can improve on single-modality baselines when no single modality already saturates, motivating multimodal sensing primarily for robustness and redundancy. An end-to-end latency experiment shows that the cloud-uplink leg dominates the budget (79–88%), establishing edge-first inference as a necessary condition for 6G URLLC gains to be observable at the application level. All experiments are conducted over Wi-Fi and MQTT with no 5G or 6G radio, so 6G compatibility is presented as a forward-looking roadmap rather than a tested capability.