Response duration tracks confidence

The timing of behavioral responses is among the most robust signatures of cognitive processing—with easier, more accurate, and more confident judgments typically made more quickly. But which aspects of response timing carry these signals? Whereas the time taken to initiate a response (e.g., the interval between stimulus onset and keypress) is one of the most popular and informative measures in experimental psychology, another aspect of response timing is its duration (e.g., how long the key is held down before being released). Here, across three preregistered experiments spanning perceptual and higher-cognitive tasks, we demonstrate that response duration reliably predicts subjective confidence, over and above response initiation time. When detecting faces (Experiment 1), judging motion coherence (Experiment 2), and answering trivia questions (Experiment 3), subjects held down a response key longer during trials in which they subsequently reported lower confidence in their judgments, as if making these judgments in a tentative fashion. In all cases, response duration accounted for variance in confidence that was not predicted by response initiation time. Our results suggest that response duration itself carries independent information about cognitive processing, advancing a useful and ubiquitously available tool to complement traditional response time measures in the study of cognition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2612367123
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Music Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Response duration tracks confidence

Ian Phillips, Chaz Firestone, Rui Zhe Goh, Hanbei Zhou
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Neuroscience and Music Perception
article

Response duration tracks confidence

Ian Phillips, Chaz Firestone, Rui Zhe Goh, Hanbei Zhou
article en

Abstract

The timing of behavioral responses is among the most robust signatures of cognitive processing—with easier, more accurate, and more confident judgments typically made more quickly. But which aspects of response timing carry these signals? Whereas the time taken to initiate a response (e.g., the interval between stimulus onset and keypress) is one of the most popular and informative measures in experimental psychology, another aspect of response timing is its duration (e.g., how long the key is held down before being released). Here, across three preregistered experiments spanning perceptual and higher-cognitive tasks, we demonstrate that response duration reliably predicts subjective confidence, over and above response initiation time. When detecting faces (Experiment 1), judging motion coherence (Experiment 2), and answering trivia questions (Experiment 3), subjects held down a response key longer during trials in which they subsequently reported lower confidence in their judgments, as if making these judgments in a tentative fashion. In all cases, response duration accounted for variance in confidence that was not predicted by response initiation time. Our results suggest that response duration itself carries independent information about cognitive processing, advancing a useful and ubiquitously available tool to complement traditional response time measures in the study of cognition.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 123(29)
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Neuroscience and Music Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.