Weighted prevalence of biochemically verified substance use in healthy adolescents across the USA

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adolescent substance use is a significant public health concern, though the scope of the problem is difficult to ascertain given reliance on self-reported substance use information. Recent, large cohort studies in adolescents and young adults suggest underreporting of substance use. Analyses here aimed to determine concordance between self-reported substance use and biochemical verification through hair samples and to estimate prevalence of the three most reported substances used by adolescents. DESIGN: Observational cohort longitudinal study design. Liquid chromatography and gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC or GC/MS-MS) were used to test hair samples for biochemically verified substance use, with results compared with self-reported substance use. Multi-step weighting methods estimated prevalence trends of cannabis, alcohol and nicotine use over time, adjusting for discrepancies in sample representation due to recruitment demography, missed visits and hair sample testing. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data came from the United States nationwide Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (n = 11 868; age 9-10 at baseline, age 15-16 at wave 6). Participants were followed annually, with data here from 2016 to 2024. MEASUREMENTS: = 11 865; n = 6133 unique participants). Participants self-reported past 3-month substance use. Sociodemographic, individual and environmental-level factors were included in inverse propensity weights to estimate prevalence rates of cannabis, alcohol and nicotine use in teens. FINDINGS: Concordance between self-report and toxicological data improved with age (for cannabis, ages 11-12 = <1%; ages 15-16 = 45%). Weighted estimates of biochemically verified substance use indicated 7.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 6.0-8.3] of 15-16 year olds engaged in biochemically detected cannabis use, 0.2% (95% CI = 0.1-0.4) used alcohol and 4.7% (95% CI = 3.7-6.0) used nicotine. CONCLUSIONS: In United States youth, the concordance between self-reported substance use patterns and biochemical verification improves with age. Biochemical verification reflects substantive cannabis and nicotine use by United States youth aged 15-16, supporting combining toxicological and self-report data to improve identification of substance use in youth when possible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Addiction
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70548
Primary Topic
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weighted prevalence of biochemically verified substance use in healthy adolescents across the USA

Biplabendu Das, Yajuan Si, Veronica Szpak, Janosch Linkersdörfer et al.
Addiction
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
article

Weighted prevalence of biochemically verified substance use in healthy adolescents across the USA

Biplabendu Das, Yajuan Si, Veronica Szpak, Janosch Linkersdörfer, Natasha E. Wade, Hayley I. Moore, Laila Tally, Le Zhang, Laura Ziemer, Alexander L. Wallace, Wesley K. Thompson, Susan F. Tapert, Marilyn A. Huestis, Ryan M. Sullivan, Krista M. Lisdahl
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adolescent substance use is a significant public health concern, though the scope of the problem is difficult to ascertain given reliance on self-reported substance use information. Recent, large cohort studies in adolescents and young adults suggest underreporting of substance use. Analyses here aimed to determine concordance between self-reported substance use and biochemical verification through hair samples and to estimate prevalence of the three most reported substances used by adolescents. DESIGN: Observational cohort longitudinal study design. Liquid chromatography and gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC or GC/MS-MS) were used to test hair samples for biochemically verified substance use, with results compared with self-reported substance use. Multi-step weighting methods estimated prevalence trends of cannabis, alcohol and nicotine use over time, adjusting for discrepancies in sample representation due to recruitment demography, missed visits and hair sample testing. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data came from the United States nationwide Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (n = 11 868; age 9-10 at baseline, age 15-16 at wave 6). Participants were followed annually, with data here from 2016 to 2024. MEASUREMENTS: = 11 865; n = 6133 unique participants). Participants self-reported past 3-month substance use. Sociodemographic, individual and environmental-level factors were included in inverse propensity weights to estimate prevalence rates of cannabis, alcohol and nicotine use in teens. FINDINGS: Concordance between self-report and toxicological data improved with age (for cannabis, ages 11-12 = <1%; ages 15-16 = 45%). Weighted estimates of biochemically verified substance use indicated 7.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 6.0-8.3] of 15-16 year olds engaged in biochemically detected cannabis use, 0.2% (95% CI = 0.1-0.4) used alcohol and 4.7% (95% CI = 3.7-6.0) used nicotine. CONCLUSIONS: In United States youth, the concordance between self-reported substance use patterns and biochemical verification improves with age. Biochemical verification reflects substantive cannabis and nicotine use by United States youth aged 15-16, supporting combining toxicological and self-report data to improve identification of substance use in youth when possible.

Addiction
J. Craig Venter Institute (US), Florida Department of Children and Families (US), University of Mary Washington (US), University of Michigan (US), University of California San Diego (US), SoundRocket (United States) (US), Laureate Institute for Brain Research (US), University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.