Toward a grounded change management communication typology

Purpose Organizational change is a critical social activity, with communication a crucial component. The conceptual models that exist are not grounded in empirical investigation and mainly reflect past practices of face-to-face communication during perceptually driven change. This study explores this gap by examining the diverse impact of technology-mediated communications upon employee attitudes to data-driven change, building toward a grounded change management communication (CMC) typology. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on previous conceptual models from social science, organizational change, management, dialogical communication and community consultation fields, we explored the impact of communications within municipal case studies using interviews and cultural surveys to develop a grounded typology of CMC. Findings The data illustrated how managers use a continuum of CMC types from directive to participative, with the latter generating change ownership, trust and commitment to change. The data also confirmed that planned, personal, participative communication strategies using key messages underpin positive employee engagement. Research limitations/implications This study integrates perspectives from change management and communication studies, a junction underdeveloped in this journal literature. This study primarily advances knowledge by proposing an exploratory grounded typology of CMC. It is unique, as it is built from current data-driven and communication technology-mediated change practice. As an initial stage in an extended branch of research, it will require further confirmatory empirical research to validate wider generalization. Practical implications The typology provides an educative tool for managers, informing CMC decisions about strategies for specific change culture, contexts, climate and resources. It can assist in harnessing evolving communication technologies and thereby improve both organizational and social health. Originality/value We extend previous conceptual modelling by generating a novel grounded CMC typology from current empirical data, that is simultaneously a pragmatic guide for managers. Further research exploring different cultures, technologies, voices and stakeholders could confirm and develop our tentative typology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Organizational Change Management
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-07-2025-0631
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward a grounded change management communication typology

Katie Turton, Llandis Barratt‐Pugh
Journal of Organizational Change Management
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Toward a grounded change management communication typology

Katie Turton, Llandis Barratt‐Pugh
article en

Abstract

Purpose Organizational change is a critical social activity, with communication a crucial component. The conceptual models that exist are not grounded in empirical investigation and mainly reflect past practices of face-to-face communication during perceptually driven change. This study explores this gap by examining the diverse impact of technology-mediated communications upon employee attitudes to data-driven change, building toward a grounded change management communication (CMC) typology. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on previous conceptual models from social science, organizational change, management, dialogical communication and community consultation fields, we explored the impact of communications within municipal case studies using interviews and cultural surveys to develop a grounded typology of CMC. Findings The data illustrated how managers use a continuum of CMC types from directive to participative, with the latter generating change ownership, trust and commitment to change. The data also confirmed that planned, personal, participative communication strategies using key messages underpin positive employee engagement. Research limitations/implications This study integrates perspectives from change management and communication studies, a junction underdeveloped in this journal literature. This study primarily advances knowledge by proposing an exploratory grounded typology of CMC. It is unique, as it is built from current data-driven and communication technology-mediated change practice. As an initial stage in an extended branch of research, it will require further confirmatory empirical research to validate wider generalization. Practical implications The typology provides an educative tool for managers, informing CMC decisions about strategies for specific change culture, contexts, climate and resources. It can assist in harnessing evolving communication technologies and thereby improve both organizational and social health. Originality/value We extend previous conceptual modelling by generating a novel grounded CMC typology from current empirical data, that is simultaneously a pragmatic guide for managers. Further research exploring different cultures, technologies, voices and stakeholders could confirm and develop our tentative typology.

Journal of Organizational Change Management
Edith Cowan University (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.