Cervical cancer screening preferences by sexual orientation among persons assigned female at birth

BACKGROUND: Disparities in up-to-date cervical cancer screening rates persist among women, including those identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual or other sexual orientation (LGB+), highlighting the need for more inclusive and targeted screening interventions. With human papillomavirus at-home self-testing recently approved, we studied cervical cancer screening preferences by sexual orientation among persons assigned female at birth. METHODS: We examined cervical cancer screening preferences among a nationally representative sample of persons assigned female at birth aged 25-65 years in the 2024 Health Information National Trends Survey who did not self-report a history of cervical cancer. We assessed variation in preference for at-home self-testing or clinician-delivered cervical cancer screening by sexual orientation using weighted Rao-Scott chi-square tests and multivariate multinomial regression. We also examined reasons for preferring at-home self-testing. RESULTS: The analytical sample included 2,168 respondents. Most self-identified as heterosexual (88.43%) and preferred cervical cancer screening by clinicians (61.45%). Cervical cancer screening preferences differed by sexual orientation (p = 0.02). LGB+ versus heterosexual respondents more frequently preferred at-home self-testing (30.97% versus 19.53%), whereas heterosexual respondents more frequently preferred testing by clinician than their LGB+ counterparts (62.81% versus 50.38%). The odds of preferring at-home self-testing over clinician-delivered screening were higher among LGB+ versus heterosexual respondents (adjusted odds ratio = 2.04, 95% confidence interval = 1.17-3.53), after adjusting for age, household annual income, marital status, health care utilization, race/ethnicity, and health insurance. The most frequently endorsed reason for preferring at-home self-testing was privacy (66.25%). Preferring at-home self-testing due to not taking time off work (35.22%), saving transportation cost (34.24%), and avoiding embarrassment (39.41%) were endorsed less frequently. Reasons for preferring at-home self-testing did not differ by sexual orientation. CONCLUSION: LGB+ respondents more frequently preferred at-home self-testing compared to heterosexual respondents. These findings highlight the potential utility of at-home self-testing in addressing screening preferences and barriers among LGB+ persons.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Women s Health
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-026-04678-7
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cervical cancer screening preferences by sexual orientation among persons assigned female at birth

Wei Yi Kong, Robert M. Jacobson, Jennifer L. St. Sauver, Kathy L. MacLaughlin et al.
BMC Women s Health
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Cervical cancer screening preferences by sexual orientation among persons assigned female at birth

Wei Yi Kong, Robert M. Jacobson, Jennifer L. St. Sauver, Kathy L. MacLaughlin, Lila J. Finney Rutten
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disparities in up-to-date cervical cancer screening rates persist among women, including those identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual or other sexual orientation (LGB+), highlighting the need for more inclusive and targeted screening interventions. With human papillomavirus at-home self-testing recently approved, we studied cervical cancer screening preferences by sexual orientation among persons assigned female at birth. METHODS: We examined cervical cancer screening preferences among a nationally representative sample of persons assigned female at birth aged 25-65 years in the 2024 Health Information National Trends Survey who did not self-report a history of cervical cancer. We assessed variation in preference for at-home self-testing or clinician-delivered cervical cancer screening by sexual orientation using weighted Rao-Scott chi-square tests and multivariate multinomial regression. We also examined reasons for preferring at-home self-testing. RESULTS: The analytical sample included 2,168 respondents. Most self-identified as heterosexual (88.43%) and preferred cervical cancer screening by clinicians (61.45%). Cervical cancer screening preferences differed by sexual orientation (p = 0.02). LGB+ versus heterosexual respondents more frequently preferred at-home self-testing (30.97% versus 19.53%), whereas heterosexual respondents more frequently preferred testing by clinician than their LGB+ counterparts (62.81% versus 50.38%). The odds of preferring at-home self-testing over clinician-delivered screening were higher among LGB+ versus heterosexual respondents (adjusted odds ratio = 2.04, 95% confidence interval = 1.17-3.53), after adjusting for age, household annual income, marital status, health care utilization, race/ethnicity, and health insurance. The most frequently endorsed reason for preferring at-home self-testing was privacy (66.25%). Preferring at-home self-testing due to not taking time off work (35.22%), saving transportation cost (34.24%), and avoiding embarrassment (39.41%) were endorsed less frequently. Reasons for preferring at-home self-testing did not differ by sexual orientation. CONCLUSION: LGB+ respondents more frequently preferred at-home self-testing compared to heterosexual respondents. These findings highlight the potential utility of at-home self-testing in addressing screening preferences and barriers among LGB+ persons.

BMC Women s Health
Mayo Clinic (US), Thomas Jefferson University (US), Adolescent Health Clinic (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), Jefferson College (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.