Primary school staff’s views and experiences of working with children of imprisoned parents/carers: A case study exploration

Aim/s: This research aimed to develop understanding of the needs of primary aged children of parents/carers in prison (CoPiP) in schools and contribute to the knowledge base on current school support in England. Method: A single case study design was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with five members of staff (four teaching and one pastoral) in one English mainstream primary school and analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Findings: Participants perceived that some CoPiP experienced academic, attendance, and emotional or behavioural challenges, although such changes were not universal. Some children were also described as seeking connection and reassurance from adults in school. CoPiP were supported through curriculum adaptations, time with adults, and considering the wider family. Information sharing between staff within school was viewed as both a means of current support and an area requiring improvement. Finally, staff training was viewed as a way that support could be strengthened. Limitations: The study is limited by a small sample size and the researcher’s insider position. Conclusions: The heterogeneous needs of CoPiP highlight the importance of flexible, person-centred support. Findings emphasise the value of a graduated approach where an assess-plan-do-review approach is used to tailor support to individual needs, as well as the potential role of Educational Psychologists in fostering understanding and collaborative, ecosystemic practice to support outcomes such as attendance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Educational and Child Psychology
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsecp.2026.43.1.68
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Primary school staff’s views and experiences of working with children of imprisoned parents/carers: A case study exploration

Rachel Hanrahan
Educational and Child Psychology
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Primary school staff’s views and experiences of working with children of imprisoned parents/carers: A case study exploration

Rachel Hanrahan
article en

Abstract

Aim/s: This research aimed to develop understanding of the needs of primary aged children of parents/carers in prison (CoPiP) in schools and contribute to the knowledge base on current school support in England. Method: A single case study design was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with five members of staff (four teaching and one pastoral) in one English mainstream primary school and analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Findings: Participants perceived that some CoPiP experienced academic, attendance, and emotional or behavioural challenges, although such changes were not universal. Some children were also described as seeking connection and reassurance from adults in school. CoPiP were supported through curriculum adaptations, time with adults, and considering the wider family. Information sharing between staff within school was viewed as both a means of current support and an area requiring improvement. Finally, staff training was viewed as a way that support could be strengthened. Limitations: The study is limited by a small sample size and the researcher’s insider position. Conclusions: The heterogeneous needs of CoPiP highlight the importance of flexible, person-centred support. Findings emphasise the value of a graduated approach where an assess-plan-do-review approach is used to tailor support to individual needs, as well as the potential role of Educational Psychologists in fostering understanding and collaborative, ecosystemic practice to support outcomes such as attendance.

Educational and Child PsychologyVol. 43(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.