The prognosis of unchanged cervical dilation in active labor during labor induction

OBJECTIVE: The most common indication for cesarean delivery (CD) in the United States is failure to progress, with a large portion of these cases occurring in the setting of active labor dystocia. There is a current lack of data to guide counseling on the likelihood of requiring CD and associated maternal outcomes in the setting of unchanged cervical dilation in the active phase. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of nulliparous patients with term singleton pregnancies who underwent induction of labor and progressed to active labor at a single institution between 1/1/2019-12/31/2019. Outcomes were compared among: (1) all who reached active labor, (2) active labor dystocia ≥2 hours, and (3) active labor dystocia ≥4 hours. The primary outcome was CD for any indication, with secondary outcomes of composite maternal morbidity and neonatal morbidity. RESULTS: Among 1309 eligible inductions, 1095 (83.7%) reached active labor and were included. Those with dystocia ≥2 hours and dystocia ≥4 hours had significantly higher risk of requiring a neonatal morbidity. CD (52.6% and 82.0%, respectively) when compared to those who reached active labor but did not experience dystocia (CD rate: 15.4%, p<0.001). Composite maternal morbidity also increased by increasing length of labor dystocia. There were no significant findings pertaining to Conclusion: CD and maternal morbidity rates are significantly higher in nulliparous patients experiencing active labor dystocia, even at the 2h mark. These findings should inform counseling around CD risk as labor progresses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Perinatology
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2914-3979
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The prognosis of unchanged cervical dilation in active labor during labor induction

Jennifer A. McCoy, Tseion Mebratu, John Rees, Lisa D. Levine et al.
American Journal of Perinatology
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

The prognosis of unchanged cervical dilation in active labor during labor induction

Jennifer A. McCoy, Tseion Mebratu, John Rees, Lisa D. Levine, Melissa Riegel, Rebecca Hamm
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The most common indication for cesarean delivery (CD) in the United States is failure to progress, with a large portion of these cases occurring in the setting of active labor dystocia. There is a current lack of data to guide counseling on the likelihood of requiring CD and associated maternal outcomes in the setting of unchanged cervical dilation in the active phase. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of nulliparous patients with term singleton pregnancies who underwent induction of labor and progressed to active labor at a single institution between 1/1/2019-12/31/2019. Outcomes were compared among: (1) all who reached active labor, (2) active labor dystocia ≥2 hours, and (3) active labor dystocia ≥4 hours. The primary outcome was CD for any indication, with secondary outcomes of composite maternal morbidity and neonatal morbidity. RESULTS: Among 1309 eligible inductions, 1095 (83.7%) reached active labor and were included. Those with dystocia ≥2 hours and dystocia ≥4 hours had significantly higher risk of requiring a neonatal morbidity. CD (52.6% and 82.0%, respectively) when compared to those who reached active labor but did not experience dystocia (CD rate: 15.4%, p<0.001). Composite maternal morbidity also increased by increasing length of labor dystocia. There were no significant findings pertaining to Conclusion: CD and maternal morbidity rates are significantly higher in nulliparous patients experiencing active labor dystocia, even at the 2h mark. These findings should inform counseling around CD risk as labor progresses.

American Journal of Perinatology
Christiana Care Health System (US), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US), Pennsylvania Hospital (US), California University of Pennsylvania (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.