Enhancing students’ reflection through writing tasks and guided teachers’ support

Deep reflection supports the development of critical thinking, yet students often need guidance to move beyond descriptive accounts of their experiences. Guiding students’ reflection is challenging for teachers, as reflection is largely an inner process and students often struggle to articulate their thoughts. To enable teachers’ support, students’ internal reflections need to be made explicit. This study examined the effects of a Collaborative Teacher Reflection (CTR) program on teachers’ guidance practices and the depth of students’ written reflections. Eight secondary school teachers and their students (N = 135) used a framework combining a cyclical process model with a depth model. Written reflection tasks were collected at the start and end of the program. Results suggest increases in the depth of written reflections across classes, with the largest gains observed among students whose teachers had less prior experience with guiding reflection. Differences between classes point to the influence of how the framework was enacted. Teachers reported increased confidence in guiding written reflections and drew on the framework to structure their approach. The study contributes to reflection research by integrating process- and product-oriented perspectives and introducing five literature-based teacher actions to support students’ reflective competence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reflective Practice
Published
2026-07-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2026.2701199
Primary Topic
Reflective Practices in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing students’ reflection through writing tasks and guided teachers’ support

Gonny Schellings, Nienke Nieveen, J.J.H. Görtzen
Reflective Practice
Reflective Practices in Education
article

Enhancing students’ reflection through writing tasks and guided teachers’ support

Gonny Schellings, Nienke Nieveen, J.J.H. Görtzen
article en

Abstract

Deep reflection supports the development of critical thinking, yet students often need guidance to move beyond descriptive accounts of their experiences. Guiding students’ reflection is challenging for teachers, as reflection is largely an inner process and students often struggle to articulate their thoughts. To enable teachers’ support, students’ internal reflections need to be made explicit. This study examined the effects of a Collaborative Teacher Reflection (CTR) program on teachers’ guidance practices and the depth of students’ written reflections. Eight secondary school teachers and their students (N = 135) used a framework combining a cyclical process model with a depth model. Written reflection tasks were collected at the start and end of the program. Results suggest increases in the depth of written reflections across classes, with the largest gains observed among students whose teachers had less prior experience with guiding reflection. Differences between classes point to the influence of how the framework was enacted. Teachers reported increased confidence in guiding written reflections and drew on the framework to structure their approach. The study contributes to reflection research by integrating process- and product-oriented perspectives and introducing five literature-based teacher actions to support students’ reflective competence.

Reflective Practice
Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Reflective Practices in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.