Interfacial coronas of green-energy nanomaterials: A life-cycle eco-to-protein corona framework and molecular fingerprints

Green-energy technologies (GETs)-including solar cells, batteries, and biomass systems-underpin climate-change mitigation, but their performance increasingly depends on engineered nanoscale interfaces, making the energy transition also an interface transition. The ligand shells, coatings, and conductive networks that optimize a device can be inherited by nanomaterials (NMs) released during manufacturing, operation, aging, accidents, and end-of-life recycling, thereby programming how this debris behaves in the environment and the body. Released fragments are seldom pristine cores with fixed identities; instead, natural organic matter, proteins, and metabolites rewrite their surfaces into eco-coronas (ECs) and protein coronas (PCs) that reset charge, aggregation, dissolution, transport, and biological recognition. These successive coronas form a life-cycle EC-PC continuum linking interfacial evolution to environmental fate, bioaccessibility, and biological effects. Yet mechanistic corona evidence comes largely from model NMs such as silver, gold, and titania, leaving the release states of deployed GET materials-perovskite (PVSK) residues and quantum dots (QDs), high-nickel (high-Ni) cathodes and black-mass residues, carbon conductors, MXenes, and metal-organic framework (MOF)-derived fragments-scattered across disconnected literatures and unable to support prediction. Here we develop a life-cycle eco-to-protein-corona framework that organizes these materials along a single interfacial sequence and recasts the corona as reportable state variables-composition, enrichment, stability, transformation, exposure context, and outcome-that make heterogeneous systems comparable. This framework exposes a structured evidence gap: GET materials are increasingly characterized for environmental transformation, persistence, and ecotoxicity, whereas matched EC/PC and health-outcome evidence remains scarce. Corona fingerprints thus offer a computable bridge from surface history to predictive, scenario-specific, and safer-by-design assessment of green-energy NMs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2026.120518
Primary Topic
Advanced oxidation water treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interfacial coronas of green-energy nanomaterials: A life-cycle eco-to-protein corona framework and molecular fingerprints

Shenghang Li, Xicheng Zhang, Shuhua Xi, Zhaoqi Zhang et al.
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Advanced oxidation water treatment
article

Interfacial coronas of green-energy nanomaterials: A life-cycle eco-to-protein corona framework and molecular fingerprints

Shenghang Li, Xicheng Zhang, Shuhua Xi, Zhaoqi Zhang, SL Peng
article en

Abstract

Green-energy technologies (GETs)-including solar cells, batteries, and biomass systems-underpin climate-change mitigation, but their performance increasingly depends on engineered nanoscale interfaces, making the energy transition also an interface transition. The ligand shells, coatings, and conductive networks that optimize a device can be inherited by nanomaterials (NMs) released during manufacturing, operation, aging, accidents, and end-of-life recycling, thereby programming how this debris behaves in the environment and the body. Released fragments are seldom pristine cores with fixed identities; instead, natural organic matter, proteins, and metabolites rewrite their surfaces into eco-coronas (ECs) and protein coronas (PCs) that reset charge, aggregation, dissolution, transport, and biological recognition. These successive coronas form a life-cycle EC-PC continuum linking interfacial evolution to environmental fate, bioaccessibility, and biological effects. Yet mechanistic corona evidence comes largely from model NMs such as silver, gold, and titania, leaving the release states of deployed GET materials-perovskite (PVSK) residues and quantum dots (QDs), high-nickel (high-Ni) cathodes and black-mass residues, carbon conductors, MXenes, and metal-organic framework (MOF)-derived fragments-scattered across disconnected literatures and unable to support prediction. Here we develop a life-cycle eco-to-protein-corona framework that organizes these materials along a single interfacial sequence and recasts the corona as reportable state variables-composition, enrichment, stability, transformation, exposure context, and outcome-that make heterogeneous systems comparable. This framework exposes a structured evidence gap: GET materials are increasingly characterized for environmental transformation, persistence, and ecotoxicity, whereas matched EC/PC and health-outcome evidence remains scarce. Corona fingerprints thus offer a computable bridge from surface history to predictive, scenario-specific, and safer-by-design assessment of green-energy NMs.

Ecotoxicology and Environmental SafetyVol. 322
Shenyang Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN), China Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Advanced oxidation water treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.