Rodent Models of Alzheimer’s Disease: Bridging the Translational Gap Through Systems-Level Integration

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a multifactorial neurodegenerative disorder and a leading cause of dementia worldwide, yet effective disease-modifying therapies remain elusive. Rodent models have been indispensable for elucidating key pathological mechanisms, including amyloid-beta (Aβ) deposition, tau pathology, neuroinflammation, and synaptic dysfunction. However, despite decades of preclinical success, the translation of therapeutic findings from rodent studies to clinical efficacy in humans has been largely unsuccessful, highlighting critical limitations in current modelling approaches. This narrative review provides a comprehensive and critical evaluation of rodent models of AD, encompassing transgenic, chemically induced, metabolic, inflammatory, and lesion-based paradigms. Rather than presenting these models in isolation, we propose a systems-level framework that categorizes them based on their ability to recapitulate distinct domains of AD pathology, including genetic, environmental, and systemic contributors. By synthesising existing research, highlighting critical gaps, and proposing a tiered minimum-criteria framework for the development of next-generation models, we offer a definitive operational roadmap instead of merely a list of deficiencies. We highlight that most existing models predominantly reflect familial and reductionist aspects of the disease, while failing to capture the complexity of sporadic AD, aging processes, vascular dysfunction, and whole-body interactions. Importantly, we emphasize emerging dimensions that are underrepresented in current rodent models, including glymphatic dysfunction, cerebral small vessel disease, and the microbiota–gut–brain axis, all of which play crucial roles in AD pathogenesis. We further discuss how integrating these factors into next-generation models may improve translational relevance and therapeutic predictability. By synthesizing current evidence and identifying key gaps, we provide a strategic roadmap for the development of more physiologically relevant and translationally robust rodent models. Advancing toward integrative, systems-based approaches will be essential for bridging the persistent gap between preclinical discoveries and clinical success in AD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14071609
Primary Topic
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rodent Models of Alzheimer’s Disease: Bridging the Translational Gap Through Systems-Level Integration

Che Mohd Nasril Che Mohd Nassir, Nurul Huda Mohd Nor, Mohd Amir Kamaruzzaman, Muhammad Zulfadli Mehat et al.
Biomedicines
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
article

Rodent Models of Alzheimer’s Disease: Bridging the Translational Gap Through Systems-Level Integration

Che Mohd Nasril Che Mohd Nassir, Nurul Huda Mohd Nor, Mohd Amir Kamaruzzaman, Muhammad Zulfadli Mehat, Mohamad Aris Mohd Moklas, Saravanan Jagadeesan, Zaw Myo Hein, Prarthana Kalerammana Gopalakrishna, Thirupathirao Vishnumukkala
article en

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a multifactorial neurodegenerative disorder and a leading cause of dementia worldwide, yet effective disease-modifying therapies remain elusive. Rodent models have been indispensable for elucidating key pathological mechanisms, including amyloid-beta (Aβ) deposition, tau pathology, neuroinflammation, and synaptic dysfunction. However, despite decades of preclinical success, the translation of therapeutic findings from rodent studies to clinical efficacy in humans has been largely unsuccessful, highlighting critical limitations in current modelling approaches. This narrative review provides a comprehensive and critical evaluation of rodent models of AD, encompassing transgenic, chemically induced, metabolic, inflammatory, and lesion-based paradigms. Rather than presenting these models in isolation, we propose a systems-level framework that categorizes them based on their ability to recapitulate distinct domains of AD pathology, including genetic, environmental, and systemic contributors. By synthesising existing research, highlighting critical gaps, and proposing a tiered minimum-criteria framework for the development of next-generation models, we offer a definitive operational roadmap instead of merely a list of deficiencies. We highlight that most existing models predominantly reflect familial and reductionist aspects of the disease, while failing to capture the complexity of sporadic AD, aging processes, vascular dysfunction, and whole-body interactions. Importantly, we emphasize emerging dimensions that are underrepresented in current rodent models, including glymphatic dysfunction, cerebral small vessel disease, and the microbiota–gut–brain axis, all of which play crucial roles in AD pathogenesis. We further discuss how integrating these factors into next-generation models may improve translational relevance and therapeutic predictability. By synthesizing current evidence and identifying key gaps, we provide a strategic roadmap for the development of more physiologically relevant and translationally robust rodent models. Advancing toward integrative, systems-based approaches will be essential for bridging the persistent gap between preclinical discoveries and clinical success in AD.

BiomedicinesVol. 14(7)
Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY), Ajman University (AE), University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (MY), University of Malaya (MY), Taylor's University (MY), University of Kuala Lumpur (MY), Sultan Zainal Abidin University (MY), IMU University (MY)
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.