Health information systems integrating patient-reported outcomes and experience: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION: Value-based healthcare (VBHC) implementation is seen as a priority in many healthcare systems worldwide because it advocates for the best health outcomes that matter to patients at the best cost. Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are increasingly used to capture this patient's perspective on their health and their experience of care. Consequently, to promote VBHC, an international emergence of health information systems integrating PROMs and PREMs has developed. OBJECTIVES: The goal of our study was to (1) identify the main existing health information systems integrating PROMs and PREMs and (2) describe how their use supports VBHC and value-based decision-making at meso or macro levels. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. We conducted a systematic search across MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Academic Search Complete databases. We carried out a mixed thematic analysis using deductive (frameworks of Franklin et al. and CIHI) and inductive approaches. RESULTS: We screened 7,497 papers from which the title and abstract of 526 papers were identified as relevant for full-text review. A total of 12 papers were retained for analysis identifying systems from six different countries. We described these systems according to four types of governance strategies. PROMs and PREMs tools were selected according to the population segments chosen. They were collected through paper, phone, and digital technologies. Barriers such as lack of time, administrative burden, reluctance to implementation and facilitators such as identifying champions, integrating patients into the process, efficient communication were described. The real-time reporting of data was an interesting innovation that was developed in several systems. PROMs and PREMs were used for benchmarking, quality improvement, performance evaluation but no concrete example of use were reported. CONCLUSION: This scoping review identifies international initiatives of health information systems integrating PROMs and PREMs. The mechanisms use to support value-based decision-making with this data at meso and macro levels are yet to be fully described. Nonetheless, these results will enable countries to learn from the approaches of others to improve the development and implementation of similar initiatives to support value-based healthcare decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Published
2026-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-026-01146-6
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health information systems integrating patient-reported outcomes and experience: a scoping review

Marie-Ève Poitras, Maxime Sasseville, Attisso Eugene, Frédéric Bergeron et al.
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Health information systems integrating patient-reported outcomes and experience: a scoping review

Marie-Ève Poitras, Maxime Sasseville, Attisso Eugene, Frédéric Bergeron, Michèle Dugas, Marie-Ève Perron, Vanessa Tremblay-Vaillancourt, Denis Roy, Pierre-Henri Roux-Levy, Wilfried Supper, Marie-Pierre Gagnon
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Value-based healthcare (VBHC) implementation is seen as a priority in many healthcare systems worldwide because it advocates for the best health outcomes that matter to patients at the best cost. Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are increasingly used to capture this patient's perspective on their health and their experience of care. Consequently, to promote VBHC, an international emergence of health information systems integrating PROMs and PREMs has developed. OBJECTIVES: The goal of our study was to (1) identify the main existing health information systems integrating PROMs and PREMs and (2) describe how their use supports VBHC and value-based decision-making at meso or macro levels. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. We conducted a systematic search across MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Academic Search Complete databases. We carried out a mixed thematic analysis using deductive (frameworks of Franklin et al. and CIHI) and inductive approaches. RESULTS: We screened 7,497 papers from which the title and abstract of 526 papers were identified as relevant for full-text review. A total of 12 papers were retained for analysis identifying systems from six different countries. We described these systems according to four types of governance strategies. PROMs and PREMs tools were selected according to the population segments chosen. They were collected through paper, phone, and digital technologies. Barriers such as lack of time, administrative burden, reluctance to implementation and facilitators such as identifying champions, integrating patients into the process, efficient communication were described. The real-time reporting of data was an interesting innovation that was developed in several systems. PROMs and PREMs were used for benchmarking, quality improvement, performance evaluation but no concrete example of use were reported. CONCLUSION: This scoping review identifies international initiatives of health information systems integrating PROMs and PREMs. The mechanisms use to support value-based decision-making with this data at meso and macro levels are yet to be fully described. Nonetheless, these results will enable countries to learn from the approaches of others to improve the development and implementation of similar initiatives to support value-based healthcare decision-making.

Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Université de Sherbrooke (CA), Cégep de Chicoutimi (CA), Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec (CA), Sante Montreal (CA), Sustainable Energy Systems (United Kingdom) (GB), Université Laval (CA)
Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé, Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.