Failure of Wide‐Diameter Dental Implants (Predominantly 5.0 mm) Show Distinct Risk Profiles—A Large Cohort Study

AIM: To evaluate survival rates and identify temporally distinct risk factors for early and late failure of wide-diameter dental implants (≥ 5.0 mm) in a large real-world cohort using landmark analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 12 041 wide-diameter implants (≥ 5.0 mm), predominantly 5.0 mm, placed in 9247 patients at a single center between January 2014 and December 2023. Implant survival was defined as the fixture remaining in situ without clinical loss or replacement at the same site. Failures were classified as early (≤ 1 year) or late (> 1 year). Kaplan-Meier survival curves and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model clustered by patient were generated. Schoenfeld residuals revealed time-varying effects for penicillin allergy, implant length, and kidney disease, prompting a landmark analysis at 365 days with separate multivariable logistic regression models for early and late failure. RESULTS: Overall implant survival was 97.5%. Kaplan-Meier estimates were 98.1% (95% CI: 97.9%-98.4%) at 1 year, 97.8% (95% CI: 97.5%-98.0%) at 3 years, and 97.6% (95% CI: 97.4%-97.9%) at 5 years. Of 301 failures, 225 (74.8%) were early and 76 (25.2%) were late. In the Cox model, short implants (≤ 8 mm; HR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.43-2.62, p < 0.001), maxillary placement (HR = 2.13 vs. mandible, p < 0.001), male sex (HR = 1.39, p = 0.010), penicillin allergy (HR = 1.66, p = 0.014), and older age (HR = 0.84 per SD, p = 0.008) independently predicted failure; smoking was borderline (HR = 1.33, p = 0.065). Landmark analysis showed that early failure was driven by penicillin allergy (OR = 2.26, p < 0.001), maxillary placement (OR = 2.42, p < 0.001), male sex (OR = 1.40, p = 0.016), and short length (OR = 1.70, p = 0.007), whereas late failure was driven by short length (OR = 3.19, p < 0.001) and kidney disease (OR = 6.11, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Wide-diameter implants achieve excellent long-term survival. Early and late failures arise from distinct mechanisms: perioperative, anatomical, and sex-related factors predominate early, while short implant length and renal disease predominate late. These findings support tailored perioperative protocols, individualized risk stratification, and targeted long-term surveillance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.70173
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Failure of Wide‐Diameter Dental Implants (Predominantly 5.0 mm) Show Distinct Risk Profiles—A Large Cohort Study

Gavriel Chaushu, Hadar Better, Thabet Asbi, Liat Barness-Hadar et al.
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Failure of Wide‐Diameter Dental Implants (Predominantly 5.0 mm) Show Distinct Risk Profiles—A Large Cohort Study

Gavriel Chaushu, Hadar Better, Thabet Asbi, Liat Barness-Hadar, Keren Better, Elazar Librush, Doron Haim
article en

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate survival rates and identify temporally distinct risk factors for early and late failure of wide-diameter dental implants (≥ 5.0 mm) in a large real-world cohort using landmark analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 12 041 wide-diameter implants (≥ 5.0 mm), predominantly 5.0 mm, placed in 9247 patients at a single center between January 2014 and December 2023. Implant survival was defined as the fixture remaining in situ without clinical loss or replacement at the same site. Failures were classified as early (≤ 1 year) or late (> 1 year). Kaplan-Meier survival curves and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model clustered by patient were generated. Schoenfeld residuals revealed time-varying effects for penicillin allergy, implant length, and kidney disease, prompting a landmark analysis at 365 days with separate multivariable logistic regression models for early and late failure. RESULTS: Overall implant survival was 97.5%. Kaplan-Meier estimates were 98.1% (95% CI: 97.9%-98.4%) at 1 year, 97.8% (95% CI: 97.5%-98.0%) at 3 years, and 97.6% (95% CI: 97.4%-97.9%) at 5 years. Of 301 failures, 225 (74.8%) were early and 76 (25.2%) were late. In the Cox model, short implants (≤ 8 mm; HR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.43-2.62, p < 0.001), maxillary placement (HR = 2.13 vs. mandible, p < 0.001), male sex (HR = 1.39, p = 0.010), penicillin allergy (HR = 1.66, p = 0.014), and older age (HR = 0.84 per SD, p = 0.008) independently predicted failure; smoking was borderline (HR = 1.33, p = 0.065). Landmark analysis showed that early failure was driven by penicillin allergy (OR = 2.26, p < 0.001), maxillary placement (OR = 2.42, p < 0.001), male sex (OR = 1.40, p = 0.016), and short length (OR = 1.70, p = 0.007), whereas late failure was driven by short length (OR = 3.19, p < 0.001) and kidney disease (OR = 6.11, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Wide-diameter implants achieve excellent long-term survival. Early and late failures arise from distinct mechanisms: perioperative, anatomical, and sex-related factors predominate early, while short implant length and renal disease predominate late. These findings support tailored perioperative protocols, individualized risk stratification, and targeted long-term surveillance.

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related ResearchVol. 28(4)
Utrecht University (NL), Rambam Health Care Campus (IL), Maccabi Healthcare Services (IL), Maccabi Institute for Health Services Research (IL), Ariel University (IL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.