Subaltern Dreams and Hegemonic Realities: Deconstructing the Failure of the Gorkhaland Movement within the Indian Nationstate

Abstract This paper reconsiders the persistent non-arriver of Gorkhaland, the demand of the Nepali speaking Gorkha community of the Darjeeling hills for a state of its own, carved out of West Bengal, not as a failure of political will or administrative delivery, but as a case study in how a modern, ostensibly democratic nationstate manufactures durability. Working through Antonio Gramsci's writings on hegemony, the integral state, and passive revolution, and reading these categories alongside the Subaltern Studies historiography that first naturalised them for the Indian context (Guha 1982; Chatterjee 1986, 1993; Spivak 1988), the paper argues that the Gorkhaland movement has been less defeated than absorbed: drawn, cycle after cycle, into institutional forms, the Darjeeling Gorkha Hill Council, the Gorkhaland Territorial Administration, that resemble concessions while functioning as instruments of containment. Gramsci's notion of transformism, the slow ingestion of oppositional leadership into the very order it once opposed, offers a more precise vocabulary for this process than the language of "cooption" ordinarily used in the literature on Indian ethnic politics. At the same time, the paper takes seriously the movement's own complicity in its containment: its reliance on charismatic strongmen, its narrow social base, and above all its inability to wage what Gramsci called a war of position the slower, less visible labour of building institutions and common sense in civil society rather than a succession of wars of manoeuvre fought and lost in the streets. The paper closes by asking, self critically, what is lost and what is gained when a theory forged to explain class domination in interwar Western Europe is transplanted onto a postcolonial, ethnically stratified federal polity, and suggests that Gorkhaland's long defeat illuminates a broader predicament facing subnational movements that must negotiate hegemony from within, rather than confront it from without. Keywords: Gorkhaland, Subaltern Studies, Hegemony, Antonio Gramsci, Passive Revolution, Transformism, Indian Nation-State, Territorial Autonomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21406066
Primary Topic
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Nepal
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subaltern Dreams and Hegemonic Realities: Deconstructing the Failure of the Gorkhaland Movement within the Indian Nationstate

Lekhraj Balmiki
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Nepal
article

Subaltern Dreams and Hegemonic Realities: Deconstructing the Failure of the Gorkhaland Movement within the Indian Nationstate

Lekhraj Balmiki
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper reconsiders the persistent non-arriver of Gorkhaland, the demand of the Nepali speaking Gorkha community of the Darjeeling hills for a state of its own, carved out of West Bengal, not as a failure of political will or administrative delivery, but as a case study in how a modern, ostensibly democratic nationstate manufactures durability. Working through Antonio Gramsci's writings on hegemony, the integral state, and passive revolution, and reading these categories alongside the Subaltern Studies historiography that first naturalised them for the Indian context (Guha 1982; Chatterjee 1986, 1993; Spivak 1988), the paper argues that the Gorkhaland movement has been less defeated than absorbed: drawn, cycle after cycle, into institutional forms, the Darjeeling Gorkha Hill Council, the Gorkhaland Territorial Administration, that resemble concessions while functioning as instruments of containment. Gramsci's notion of transformism, the slow ingestion of oppositional leadership into the very order it once opposed, offers a more precise vocabulary for this process than the language of "cooption" ordinarily used in the literature on Indian ethnic politics. At the same time, the paper takes seriously the movement's own complicity in its containment: its reliance on charismatic strongmen, its narrow social base, and above all its inability to wage what Gramsci called a war of position the slower, less visible labour of building institutions and common sense in civil society rather than a succession of wars of manoeuvre fought and lost in the streets. The paper closes by asking, self critically, what is lost and what is gained when a theory forged to explain class domination in interwar Western Europe is transplanted onto a postcolonial, ethnically stratified federal polity, and suggests that Gorkhaland's long defeat illuminates a broader predicament facing subnational movements that must negotiate hegemony from within, rather than confront it from without. Keywords: Gorkhaland, Subaltern Studies, Hegemony, Antonio Gramsci, Passive Revolution, Transformism, Indian Nation-State, Territorial Autonomy.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Calcutta (IN), Calcutta Research Group (IN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Nepal
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.