Countryside aflame: Fire as a hazard in the rural Philippines, 1850–1950

Abstract Fire has shaped human evolution, social organisation, and technological development, yet modern fire science remains anchored in categories derived largely from Western experience: wildland fires, the wildland–urban interface, and urban conflagrations. These frameworks obscure a fourth, largely overlooked regime – village fire – rural settlements that lack the structural protections, materials, and services characteristic of urban areas. In the Philippines, where rural settlement dominated into the twentieth century, village fire was the principal way people encountered fire risk. Using evidence from the Historical Data Papers (1951), this study reconstructs a village fire regime marked by highly combustible construction, new technological sources of ignition, and the recurrent weaponisation of flame in conflict. Contrary to the urban ‘fire gap’, village fires did not decline but intensified, occasionally acting as catalysts for community renewal. Recognising village fire as a distinct category challenges Western-derived fire typologies and broadens the environmental history of fire.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rural History
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956793326100314
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Countryside aflame: Fire as a hazard in the rural Philippines, 1850–1950

Greg Bankoff, Mary Donna Grace Cuenca, David Lozada, Marie Beatriz D. Gulinao
Rural History
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Countryside aflame: Fire as a hazard in the rural Philippines, 1850–1950

Greg Bankoff, Mary Donna Grace Cuenca, David Lozada, Marie Beatriz D. Gulinao
article en

Abstract

Abstract Fire has shaped human evolution, social organisation, and technological development, yet modern fire science remains anchored in categories derived largely from Western experience: wildland fires, the wildland–urban interface, and urban conflagrations. These frameworks obscure a fourth, largely overlooked regime – village fire – rural settlements that lack the structural protections, materials, and services characteristic of urban areas. In the Philippines, where rural settlement dominated into the twentieth century, village fire was the principal way people encountered fire risk. Using evidence from the Historical Data Papers (1951), this study reconstructs a village fire regime marked by highly combustible construction, new technological sources of ignition, and the recurrent weaponisation of flame in conflict. Contrary to the urban ‘fire gap’, village fires did not decline but intensified, occasionally acting as catalysts for community renewal. Recognising village fire as a distinct category challenges Western-derived fire typologies and broadens the environmental history of fire.

Rural History
Ateneo de Manila University (PH), Ateneo de Davao University (PH)
Ateneo de Manila University
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.