An Exploration of Systemic and Individual Drivers of Adoption of Early Interventions for Trauma in Schools

Childhood trauma exposure is prevalent and often associated with adverse outcomes. Despite evidence of effectiveness, systemic challenges hinder implementation of trauma-specific interventions within school settings. The current study explores implementation drivers of three school-based trauma interventions. Participants were 93 clinicians from 14 districts. Results revealed low adoption: only 17% of trained clinicians facilitated a full intervention following training. In contrast, 64.5% of trained clinicians reported using intervention components flexibly outside of a formal group. No differences in implementation drivers emerged between clinicians/districts who did and did not adopt groups. However, clinicians who used intervention components flexibly reported higher perceived intervention alignment and support from administrators than those who did not. Recommendations for implementation and pathways for future study are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied School Psychology
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2026.2701657
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Exploration of Systemic and Individual Drivers of Adoption of Early Interventions for Trauma in Schools

Sharon Hoover, Saadia Elahi, Jerica L. Knox, Tali Raviv
Journal of Applied School Psychology
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

An Exploration of Systemic and Individual Drivers of Adoption of Early Interventions for Trauma in Schools

Sharon Hoover, Saadia Elahi, Jerica L. Knox, Tali Raviv
article en

Abstract

Childhood trauma exposure is prevalent and often associated with adverse outcomes. Despite evidence of effectiveness, systemic challenges hinder implementation of trauma-specific interventions within school settings. The current study explores implementation drivers of three school-based trauma interventions. Participants were 93 clinicians from 14 districts. Results revealed low adoption: only 17% of trained clinicians facilitated a full intervention following training. In contrast, 64.5% of trained clinicians reported using intervention components flexibly outside of a formal group. No differences in implementation drivers emerged between clinicians/districts who did and did not adopt groups. However, clinicians who used intervention components flexibly reported higher perceived intervention alignment and support from administrators than those who did not. Recommendations for implementation and pathways for future study are discussed.

Journal of Applied School Psychology
Northwestern University (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (US), Lurie Children's Hospital (US)
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Exploration of Systemic and Individual Drivers of Adoption of Early Interventions for Trauma in Schools — Sharon Hoover, Saadia Elahi, et al. · Journal of Applied School Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS