The centrality of education in South Korea: a cultural analysis of education policy during COVID-19

This paper offers a cultural analysis of policymaking through a case study of education policy in South Korea during COVID-19. It highlights the centrality of education to Korean society and traces its influence in problematising, constituting and enacting policy responses. Analysis of documentary evidence and of interviews with key policy actors identifies two priorities: the need to maintain education provision with minimum disruption, and the safeguarding educational opportunities for all students and applicants to universities. These priorities reflect a culturally embedded and culturally specific narrative of egalitarianism and illustrate the importance of contextualised readings of fairness and merit in understanding public policy. In making this argument, the paper seeks to contribute to current debates in comparative education and education policy studies by adopting a culturally informed, relationship-centred and process-oriented approach that may have been neglected in Western-centric frameworks stressing global policy convergence or global-local dynamics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Compare A Journal of Comparative and International Education
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2026.2701778
Primary Topic
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The centrality of education in South Korea: a cultural analysis of education policy during COVID-19

Hoonhui Cho
Compare A Journal of Comparative and International Education
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
article

The centrality of education in South Korea: a cultural analysis of education policy during COVID-19

Hoonhui Cho
article en

Abstract

This paper offers a cultural analysis of policymaking through a case study of education policy in South Korea during COVID-19. It highlights the centrality of education to Korean society and traces its influence in problematising, constituting and enacting policy responses. Analysis of documentary evidence and of interviews with key policy actors identifies two priorities: the need to maintain education provision with minimum disruption, and the safeguarding educational opportunities for all students and applicants to universities. These priorities reflect a culturally embedded and culturally specific narrative of egalitarianism and illustrate the importance of contextualised readings of fairness and merit in understanding public policy. In making this argument, the paper seeks to contribute to current debates in comparative education and education policy studies by adopting a culturally informed, relationship-centred and process-oriented approach that may have been neglected in Western-centric frameworks stressing global policy convergence or global-local dynamics.

Compare A Journal of Comparative and International Education
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The centrality of education in South Korea: a cultural analysis of education policy during COVID-19 — Hoonhui Cho · Compare A Journal of Comparative and International Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS