Was the fruit in front of me or near the river? Biological relevance and reference frame preferences in object-location memory across the lifespan

Spatial memory research has traditionally focused on how environmental features shape the use of egocentric and allocentric reference frames, with little attention to the role of the objects themselves. Here, using two datasets collected with a virtual reality object-location memory task, we investigated whether the biological relevance of objects modulates spatial memory performance depending on the reference frame used at retrieval. Participants encoded the positions of biological entities and artifacts and retrieved them using either egocentric or allocentric recall cues. In Study 1, young adults (N = 37) showed a significant interaction between object category and recall cue: biological entities were recalled more accurately under allocentric than egocentric retrieval, while artifacts showed the opposite pattern, though the category difference was significant only under allocentric retrieval. In Study 2, older adults and patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (N = 80) showed a preserved biological advantage in overall spatial performance, whereas the interaction with recall cue was no longer observed, a pattern consistent with the reduced allocentric contribution typically associated with aging. These findings provide initial evidence that object categories may shape the retrieval of spatial locations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-026-02961-0
Primary Topic
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Was the fruit in front of me or near the river? Biological relevance and reference frame preferences in object-location memory across the lifespan

Karine Goulene, Cosimo Tuena, Claudia Repetto, Giuseppe Riva et al.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
article

Was the fruit in front of me or near the river? Biological relevance and reference frame preferences in object-location memory across the lifespan

Karine Goulene, Cosimo Tuena, Claudia Repetto, Giuseppe Riva, Marco Stramba-Badiale, Silvia Serino
article en

Abstract

Spatial memory research has traditionally focused on how environmental features shape the use of egocentric and allocentric reference frames, with little attention to the role of the objects themselves. Here, using two datasets collected with a virtual reality object-location memory task, we investigated whether the biological relevance of objects modulates spatial memory performance depending on the reference frame used at retrieval. Participants encoded the positions of biological entities and artifacts and retrieved them using either egocentric or allocentric recall cues. In Study 1, young adults (N = 37) showed a significant interaction between object category and recall cue: biological entities were recalled more accurately under allocentric than egocentric retrieval, while artifacts showed the opposite pattern, though the category difference was significant only under allocentric retrieval. In Study 2, older adults and patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (N = 80) showed a preserved biological advantage in overall spatial performance, whereas the interaction with recall cue was no longer observed, a pattern consistent with the reduced allocentric contribution typically associated with aging. These findings provide initial evidence that object categories may shape the retrieval of spatial locations.

Psychonomic Bulletin & ReviewVol. 33(6)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Università degli Studi eCampus (IT), IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Università degli Studi di Milano, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Ministero della Salute
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.