The Generative AI Dilemma in Knowledge-Intensive Teams

In knowledge-intensive teams, collaborative interactions among teammates have historically served as the primary means through which members access task-relevant information, advice, and feedback. Generative artificial intelligence (AI), however, now offers members an alternative source of these resources. We develop a multilevel theory that proposes team members who are proficient with generative AI are more likely to perceive the resources it can offer as functionally equivalent to those they can access through their teammates. In turn, we propose that some members will shift their knowledge-seeking interactions to generative AI. As this substitution behavior accumulates within a team, the team’s collaboration network is less likely to foster the critical emergent states that support team effectiveness. The key insight of our theory is a dilemma for knowledge-intensive teams: generative AI can boost team performance by helping members to work more efficiently, but a lack of collaboration among teammates can offset these gains and undermine team satisfaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academy of Management Review
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2024.0538
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Generative AI Dilemma in Knowledge-Intensive Teams

Jonathon N. Cummings, Jessica Reif
Academy of Management Review
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

The Generative AI Dilemma in Knowledge-Intensive Teams

Jonathon N. Cummings, Jessica Reif
article en

Abstract

In knowledge-intensive teams, collaborative interactions among teammates have historically served as the primary means through which members access task-relevant information, advice, and feedback. Generative artificial intelligence (AI), however, now offers members an alternative source of these resources. We develop a multilevel theory that proposes team members who are proficient with generative AI are more likely to perceive the resources it can offer as functionally equivalent to those they can access through their teammates. In turn, we propose that some members will shift their knowledge-seeking interactions to generative AI. As this substitution behavior accumulates within a team, the team’s collaboration network is less likely to foster the critical emergent states that support team effectiveness. The key insight of our theory is a dilemma for knowledge-intensive teams: generative AI can boost team performance by helping members to work more efficiently, but a lack of collaboration among teammates can offset these gains and undermine team satisfaction.

Academy of Management Review
Duke University (US), California University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.