A Mixed Methods Service Evaluation of a Peer-Supported Breakfast Group in Adult Inpatient Burn Rehabilitation

Background: Burn injuries have complex physical and psychological consequences, making holistic rehabilitation essential. This mixed methods service evaluation explored the acceptability and perceived benefits of a peer-supported breakfast group delivered as part of routine occupational therapy practice for adult inpatient burn survivors. Methods: A tailored survey integrating PROMIS items with open-ended questions was completed by nine participants. All English-speaking inpatients aged >18 years who attended were invited to participate. In total 36 patients attended and 9 completed the survey (n = 36; n = 9). A convergent design integrated open-ended survey responses with PROMIS patient-reported outcome items, analysed thematically and interpreted using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) and MMR-RHS (Mixed Methods Reporting—Rehabilitation and Health Sciences) frameworks. Results: Quantitative findings suggested high perceived physical function and strong emotional support, with low anxiety and depression, and low social isolation. Reflexive thematic analysis generated four themes: fostering human connection and emotional wellbeing; restoring autonomy and confidence; preparing physically and psychologically for discharge; and the influence of the rehabilitation environment. Conclusion: While descriptive only, findings provide early insight into the value of peer-supported group activity in inpatient burn care. Larger controlled studies with baseline measurement are needed to evaluate effectiveness and implementation feasibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Burn Journal
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj7030040
Primary Topic
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Mixed Methods Service Evaluation of a Peer-Supported Breakfast Group in Adult Inpatient Burn Rehabilitation

Lottie Elizabeth Armitage
European Burn Journal
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
article

A Mixed Methods Service Evaluation of a Peer-Supported Breakfast Group in Adult Inpatient Burn Rehabilitation

Lottie Elizabeth Armitage
article en

Abstract

Background: Burn injuries have complex physical and psychological consequences, making holistic rehabilitation essential. This mixed methods service evaluation explored the acceptability and perceived benefits of a peer-supported breakfast group delivered as part of routine occupational therapy practice for adult inpatient burn survivors. Methods: A tailored survey integrating PROMIS items with open-ended questions was completed by nine participants. All English-speaking inpatients aged >18 years who attended were invited to participate. In total 36 patients attended and 9 completed the survey (n = 36; n = 9). A convergent design integrated open-ended survey responses with PROMIS patient-reported outcome items, analysed thematically and interpreted using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) and MMR-RHS (Mixed Methods Reporting—Rehabilitation and Health Sciences) frameworks. Results: Quantitative findings suggested high perceived physical function and strong emotional support, with low anxiety and depression, and low social isolation. Reflexive thematic analysis generated four themes: fostering human connection and emotional wellbeing; restoring autonomy and confidence; preparing physically and psychologically for discharge; and the influence of the rehabilitation environment. Conclusion: While descriptive only, findings provide early insight into the value of peer-supported group activity in inpatient burn care. Larger controlled studies with baseline measurement are needed to evaluate effectiveness and implementation feasibility.

European Burn JournalVol. 7(3)
University of the West of England (GB), Broomfield Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Mixed Methods Service Evaluation of a Peer-Supported Breakfast Group in Adult Inpatient Burn Rehabilitation — Lottie Elizabeth Armitage · European Burn Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS