A Secure Multi-Layer Edge-Based Sensor Architecture for Building-Level Disaster Monitoring and Decision Support

Natural and human-induced disasters can cause significant loss of life and property, particularly at the building level, highlighting the need for effective early detection, real-time monitoring, and rapid post-disaster response. Current disaster management approaches largely rely on citizen reports and manual observations, which may lead to delays and inefficient resource allocation, especially in large-scale events. This study proposes a secure, modular, multi-layer disaster monitoring and decision-support architecture that integrates sensor-based building-edge monitoring units deployed at both the building and apartment levels with a central emergency monitoring system. The architecture comprises three main layers: edge sensing, secure cellular communication, and central decision-making. Building-edge monitoring units collect data related to structural motion and inclination indicators, fire, flooding, and gas leaks, perform preliminary processing, and transmit aggregated data securely to the central system. Communication security is ensured through a certificate-based authentication mechanism supported by a dedicated certificate authority, reducing the risk of unauthorized access and fraudulent data injection. The central system performs automated event detection and separately evaluates physical building condition and communication status, enabling prioritized response planning. To evaluate feasibility, a two-building prototype was implemented and tested through scenario-based experiments involving two independently operating building-edge monitoring units connected to the same central monitoring system. The prototype demonstrated concurrent secure data acquisition and central aggregation from two buildings; however, district- and regional-scale performance requires further validation through larger-scale controlled load tests and field deployments. Under laboratory conditions, the prototype demonstrated sensor-data acquisition, authenticated transmission, and centralized event classification. End-to-end latency and building-edge monitoring unit power consumption were also measured; however, the prototype was not validated under environmental conditions representative of real disasters. Overall, the findings suggest that sensor-based, secure, and centralized monitoring systems may complement traditional disaster management approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26144531
Primary Topic
Gait Recognition and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Secure Multi-Layer Edge-Based Sensor Architecture for Building-Level Disaster Monitoring and Decision Support

Kerem Erzurumlu, Kenan Rıfat Erzurumlu
Sensors
Gait Recognition and Analysis
article

A Secure Multi-Layer Edge-Based Sensor Architecture for Building-Level Disaster Monitoring and Decision Support

Kerem Erzurumlu, Kenan Rıfat Erzurumlu
article en

Abstract

Natural and human-induced disasters can cause significant loss of life and property, particularly at the building level, highlighting the need for effective early detection, real-time monitoring, and rapid post-disaster response. Current disaster management approaches largely rely on citizen reports and manual observations, which may lead to delays and inefficient resource allocation, especially in large-scale events. This study proposes a secure, modular, multi-layer disaster monitoring and decision-support architecture that integrates sensor-based building-edge monitoring units deployed at both the building and apartment levels with a central emergency monitoring system. The architecture comprises three main layers: edge sensing, secure cellular communication, and central decision-making. Building-edge monitoring units collect data related to structural motion and inclination indicators, fire, flooding, and gas leaks, perform preliminary processing, and transmit aggregated data securely to the central system. Communication security is ensured through a certificate-based authentication mechanism supported by a dedicated certificate authority, reducing the risk of unauthorized access and fraudulent data injection. The central system performs automated event detection and separately evaluates physical building condition and communication status, enabling prioritized response planning. To evaluate feasibility, a two-building prototype was implemented and tested through scenario-based experiments involving two independently operating building-edge monitoring units connected to the same central monitoring system. The prototype demonstrated concurrent secure data acquisition and central aggregation from two buildings; however, district- and regional-scale performance requires further validation through larger-scale controlled load tests and field deployments. Under laboratory conditions, the prototype demonstrated sensor-data acquisition, authenticated transmission, and centralized event classification. End-to-end latency and building-edge monitoring unit power consumption were also measured; however, the prototype was not validated under environmental conditions representative of real disasters. Overall, the findings suggest that sensor-based, secure, and centralized monitoring systems may complement traditional disaster management approaches.

SensorsVol. 26(14)
Ege University (TR), Ordu University (TR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Gait Recognition and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.