Intermittent aeration enhances biological nitrogen removal from low C/N synthetic domestic wastewater

This work reports on the application of intermittent aeration (IA) in continuous-flow systems for biological nitrogen removal from low C/N wastewater (3.5 gCOD/gNH 4 -N). In similar scenarios, low organic matter concentrations hamper the denitrification step due to e-donor limitation of ordinary heterotrophic organisms (OHO) (e-donor need: 2.86/(1-Y obs ) gCOD/gNO 3 -N). A 25 L completely stirred bench-scale bioreactor equipped with on-line probes (pH, DO, ORP, NH 4 -N, NO 3 -N) was operated under IA at a moderate sludge retention time (SRT close to 25 ± 5 days) for 160 days of operation. The experimental period was structured in three main steps: continuous aeration (CA) (STEP 1); time-controlled IA (STEP 2); probe-controlled IA (STEP 3). The organic matter removal efficiency was not markedly affected by IA with removal efficiency increasing from 90% (STEP 1) to 98% (STEP 3) after a slight decrease down to 82% (STEP 2), likely due to a transitional phase during microbial adaptation. After the application of the IA process, a decrease in Y obs was observed from 0.43 to 0.26 gCOD biomass /gCOD rem for STEP 1 and STEP 3, respectively. This resulted in about 40% less of sludge production, and disposal costs saving. Because a lower Yobs reduces the e-donor demand during the denitrification step, the biological nitrogen removal efficiency increased from 46.7% (STEP 2,a ) to 78.2% (STEP 3,a ). STEP 3 (probe-controlled IA) proved to be the best optimized operational condition compared to STEP 2 (time-controlled IA), due to the probe-controlled logic that avoids excessive aerated or undesirable anaerobic periods especially in cases of low influent organic and/or nitrogen loads. These remarkable results highlight that the IA process, operated at moderately high SRT and optimized using probe-controlled logic, is an attractive strategy for biological nitrogen removal from low C/N wastewater.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.130462
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intermittent aeration enhances biological nitrogen removal from low C/N synthetic domestic wastewater

Riccardo Campo, Gaetano Di Bella, Santo Fabio Corsino, Daniele Di Trapani et al.
Journal of Environmental Management
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
article

Intermittent aeration enhances biological nitrogen removal from low C/N synthetic domestic wastewater

Riccardo Campo, Gaetano Di Bella, Santo Fabio Corsino, Daniele Di Trapani, Enrico Licitra, Giorgio Maria Castiglione, Federica Emanuela Giarratana, Maria Francesca Fonte
article en

Abstract

This work reports on the application of intermittent aeration (IA) in continuous-flow systems for biological nitrogen removal from low C/N wastewater (3.5 gCOD/gNH 4 -N). In similar scenarios, low organic matter concentrations hamper the denitrification step due to e-donor limitation of ordinary heterotrophic organisms (OHO) (e-donor need: 2.86/(1-Y obs ) gCOD/gNO 3 -N). A 25 L completely stirred bench-scale bioreactor equipped with on-line probes (pH, DO, ORP, NH 4 -N, NO 3 -N) was operated under IA at a moderate sludge retention time (SRT close to 25 ± 5 days) for 160 days of operation. The experimental period was structured in three main steps: continuous aeration (CA) (STEP 1); time-controlled IA (STEP 2); probe-controlled IA (STEP 3). The organic matter removal efficiency was not markedly affected by IA with removal efficiency increasing from 90% (STEP 1) to 98% (STEP 3) after a slight decrease down to 82% (STEP 2), likely due to a transitional phase during microbial adaptation. After the application of the IA process, a decrease in Y obs was observed from 0.43 to 0.26 gCOD biomass /gCOD rem for STEP 1 and STEP 3, respectively. This resulted in about 40% less of sludge production, and disposal costs saving. Because a lower Yobs reduces the e-donor demand during the denitrification step, the biological nitrogen removal efficiency increased from 46.7% (STEP 2,a ) to 78.2% (STEP 3,a ). STEP 3 (probe-controlled IA) proved to be the best optimized operational condition compared to STEP 2 (time-controlled IA), due to the probe-controlled logic that avoids excessive aerated or undesirable anaerobic periods especially in cases of low influent organic and/or nitrogen loads. These remarkable results highlight that the IA process, operated at moderately high SRT and optimized using probe-controlled logic, is an attractive strategy for biological nitrogen removal from low C/N wastewater.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 414
Università degli Studi di Enna Kore (IT), University of Palermo (IT)
European Commission, European Regional Development Fund
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.