Machine learning-based uncertainty quantification for energy consumption and driving range estimation in electric cargo vehicles

Abstract The energy consumption estimation and remaining driving range estimation are important aspects of electric vehicles for intelligent transportation systems, battery management systems, and for reducing range anxiety. Typical deterministic models, however, do not account for the uncertainty associated with dynamic driving behaviour, traffic variations, environmental conditions, and battery characteristics, and therefore have limited prediction ability. This study implements a comparative analysis of several uncertainty-aware machine learning models to estimate energy consumption and driving range of EVs using real-world driving data. The developed methods include SVR Residual Bootstrap, RF Variance Estimation, SVR Conformal Prediction, SVR Adaptive Conformal Prediction, LightGBM Quantile Regression, LightGBM Conformal Quantile Regression (CQR), and LightGBM Adaptive Conformal Quantile Regression (ACQR). The models are evaluated using deterministic metrics including RMSE, MAE, R 2 , and uncertainty-specific metrics including PICP and MPIW. The experimental results showed that accuracy of predictions, uncertainty coverage reliability, and interval sharpness were not equally good for the frameworks evaluated, resulting in significant trade-offs. SVR Residual Bootstrap had the best prediction performance in a deterministic prediction with RMSE = 2.358, MAE = 1.742, and R 2 = 0.893. RF Variance and LightGBM CQR had higher uncertainty coverage but with wider intervals, while LightGBM ACQR had better balance between uncertainty coverage reliability and interval efficiency. Among all implemented approaches, the results of the SVR Conformal approach showed consistent and stable uncertainty estimation with reliability of the coverage (PICP = 0.95) and moderate interval width (MPIW = 15), making it suitable for real-world EV applications. The results underscore the significance of incorporating uncertainty quantification in EV prediction systems to ensure reliable and dependable sustainable transportation applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Informatics
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-026-00682-1
Primary Topic
Vehicle emissions and performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning-based uncertainty quantification for energy consumption and driving range estimation in electric cargo vehicles

Archana Chaudhari, Mrugank Gandhi
Energy Informatics
Vehicle emissions and performance
article

Machine learning-based uncertainty quantification for energy consumption and driving range estimation in electric cargo vehicles

Archana Chaudhari, Mrugank Gandhi
article en

Abstract

Abstract The energy consumption estimation and remaining driving range estimation are important aspects of electric vehicles for intelligent transportation systems, battery management systems, and for reducing range anxiety. Typical deterministic models, however, do not account for the uncertainty associated with dynamic driving behaviour, traffic variations, environmental conditions, and battery characteristics, and therefore have limited prediction ability. This study implements a comparative analysis of several uncertainty-aware machine learning models to estimate energy consumption and driving range of EVs using real-world driving data. The developed methods include SVR Residual Bootstrap, RF Variance Estimation, SVR Conformal Prediction, SVR Adaptive Conformal Prediction, LightGBM Quantile Regression, LightGBM Conformal Quantile Regression (CQR), and LightGBM Adaptive Conformal Quantile Regression (ACQR). The models are evaluated using deterministic metrics including RMSE, MAE, R 2 , and uncertainty-specific metrics including PICP and MPIW. The experimental results showed that accuracy of predictions, uncertainty coverage reliability, and interval sharpness were not equally good for the frameworks evaluated, resulting in significant trade-offs. SVR Residual Bootstrap had the best prediction performance in a deterministic prediction with RMSE = 2.358, MAE = 1.742, and R 2 = 0.893. RF Variance and LightGBM CQR had higher uncertainty coverage but with wider intervals, while LightGBM ACQR had better balance between uncertainty coverage reliability and interval efficiency. Among all implemented approaches, the results of the SVR Conformal approach showed consistent and stable uncertainty estimation with reliability of the coverage (PICP = 0.95) and moderate interval width (MPIW = 15), making it suitable for real-world EV applications. The results underscore the significance of incorporating uncertainty quantification in EV prediction systems to ensure reliable and dependable sustainable transportation applications.

Energy Informatics
Symbiosis International University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Vehicle emissions and performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.