The Recommendation Paradox: Perspectives on Genetic Testing in Huntington's Disease Families

Huntington's disease (HD) families face complex decisions about predictive genetic testing and reproductive options, including preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), and particularly PGT for Monogenic Disorders (PGT-M). We examined attitudes toward genetic testing and reproductive options across affected groups within HD families (e.g., people with HD, spouse/caregivers, and at-risk family members), in a healthcare system with full funding for genetic services. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 51 participants (17 people with HD, 20 at-risk relatives, 14 spouses/partners), recruited from the National HD Clinic in Tel Aviv, Israel. Framework Analysis was employed to enable systematic comparison across groups. Three themes emerged from the analysis: "Surprised by HD" revealed that family members were often unaware of genetic risk despite predictable inheritance, reflecting patterns of nondisclosure and misdiagnosis; "Truth or luck" captured divergent attitudes toward predictive testing, with some participants advocating for early knowledge while others emphasized the psychological burden of knowing in the absence of a cure. Together, these themes formed the context for a central finding: "The recommendation paradox", a striking pattern where individuals who avoided or regretted personal predictive testing nonetheless strongly endorsed reproductive options for offspring, a tension that manifested differently across groups depending on their relationship to HD. The recommendation paradox reveals ethical tensions between reproductive autonomy and emerging expectations of genetic responsibility. This pattern persists even when economic barriers are removed, demonstrating that psychological factors remain primary determinants of testing uptake. Genetic counseling should explicitly address divergent attitudes toward personal versus offspring testing, recognizing that support for prevention does not necessarily indicate readiness for personal testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.70265
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Recommendation Paradox: Perspectives on Genetic Testing in Huntington's Disease Families

Nurit Omer, Yael Manor, Noit Inbar, Adi Reches et al.
Journal of Genetic Counseling
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

The Recommendation Paradox: Perspectives on Genetic Testing in Huntington's Disease Families

Nurit Omer, Yael Manor, Noit Inbar, Adi Reches, Aya Bar David, Achinoam Socher, T Gurevich, Penina Ponger
article en

Abstract

Huntington's disease (HD) families face complex decisions about predictive genetic testing and reproductive options, including preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), and particularly PGT for Monogenic Disorders (PGT-M). We examined attitudes toward genetic testing and reproductive options across affected groups within HD families (e.g., people with HD, spouse/caregivers, and at-risk family members), in a healthcare system with full funding for genetic services. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 51 participants (17 people with HD, 20 at-risk relatives, 14 spouses/partners), recruited from the National HD Clinic in Tel Aviv, Israel. Framework Analysis was employed to enable systematic comparison across groups. Three themes emerged from the analysis: "Surprised by HD" revealed that family members were often unaware of genetic risk despite predictable inheritance, reflecting patterns of nondisclosure and misdiagnosis; "Truth or luck" captured divergent attitudes toward predictive testing, with some participants advocating for early knowledge while others emphasized the psychological burden of knowing in the absence of a cure. Together, these themes formed the context for a central finding: "The recommendation paradox", a striking pattern where individuals who avoided or regretted personal predictive testing nonetheless strongly endorsed reproductive options for offspring, a tension that manifested differently across groups depending on their relationship to HD. The recommendation paradox reveals ethical tensions between reproductive autonomy and emerging expectations of genetic responsibility. This pattern persists even when economic barriers are removed, demonstrating that psychological factors remain primary determinants of testing uptake. Genetic counseling should explicitly address divergent attitudes toward personal versus offspring testing, recognizing that support for prevention does not necessarily indicate readiness for personal testing.

Journal of Genetic CounselingVol. 35(4)
Tel Aviv University (IL), Ono Academic College (IL), Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.