Technical Feasibility and Early Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Large-Footprint Cage via Tubular Approach: A Novel Surgical Technique

Abstract Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) has become a widely accepted technique for the management of degenerative lumbar spine pathologies. Traditionally, standard TLIF cages have a relatively small footprint, providing limited endplate coverage. Larger-footprint cages are typically inserted through anterior or lateral approaches. The study aimed to describe the surgical technique of MIS-TLIF using a large-footprint cage (MIS-LTLIF) and evaluate its early feasibility and safety. A prospective analysis was conducted on 30 patients (39 levels) who underwent MIS-LTLIF for degenerative lumbar spine disease. After standard tubular docking over the facet joint, complete facetectomy was performed to create a wide window between the exiting and traversing nerve roots. After meticulous disc space preparation, the cage was inserted and rotated in a reverse orthogonal maneuver to orient it in the horizontal position. All these patients were assessed with parameters including blood loss, operative time, pre- and postoperative days 14 visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, and any other postoperative complications. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t-test. Preliminary findings demonstrate that insertion of large-footprint cage is feasible via MIS-TLIF approach Our average cage size was 40 × 15 × 10 mm, and the average operative time was 1 hour 55 minutes per level. VAS (back pain) improved preoperatively from 8.00 ± 0.87 to 4.22 ± 0.97 (p = 0.000039), while VAS (leg pain) improved from 8.22 ± 0.83 to 1.67 ± 0.51 (p = 0.000000017) postoperatively. The ODI score improved from 59.78 ± 4.87 to 21.22 ± 2.68 (p < 0.001) indicating statistically significant improvement. Only one patient complained of postoperative unilateral radicular pain, which got relieved with medication over 2 weeks and one patient had cage migration, which was realigned following the same steps of the surgery. MIS-LTLIF represents a novel, minimally invasive modification of the conventional MIS-TLIF technique that facilitates the placement of a large-footprint cage. By combining the advantages of posterior minimally invasive access with the biomechanical benefits of wider-footprint cages, this technique has the potential to bridge the gap between MIS-TLIF and anterior/lateral fusion strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1825548
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technical Feasibility and Early Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Large-Footprint Cage via Tubular Approach: A Novel Surgical Technique

Ayush Sharma, Shubham Kadam, Nandan Marathe, Avi Rangala et al.
Asian Journal of Neurosurgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Technical Feasibility and Early Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Large-Footprint Cage via Tubular Approach: A Novel Surgical Technique

Ayush Sharma, Shubham Kadam, Nandan Marathe, Avi Rangala, Sourav L. Das, Ajit Rampure
article en

Abstract

Abstract Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) has become a widely accepted technique for the management of degenerative lumbar spine pathologies. Traditionally, standard TLIF cages have a relatively small footprint, providing limited endplate coverage. Larger-footprint cages are typically inserted through anterior or lateral approaches. The study aimed to describe the surgical technique of MIS-TLIF using a large-footprint cage (MIS-LTLIF) and evaluate its early feasibility and safety. A prospective analysis was conducted on 30 patients (39 levels) who underwent MIS-LTLIF for degenerative lumbar spine disease. After standard tubular docking over the facet joint, complete facetectomy was performed to create a wide window between the exiting and traversing nerve roots. After meticulous disc space preparation, the cage was inserted and rotated in a reverse orthogonal maneuver to orient it in the horizontal position. All these patients were assessed with parameters including blood loss, operative time, pre- and postoperative days 14 visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, and any other postoperative complications. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t-test. Preliminary findings demonstrate that insertion of large-footprint cage is feasible via MIS-TLIF approach Our average cage size was 40 × 15 × 10 mm, and the average operative time was 1 hour 55 minutes per level. VAS (back pain) improved preoperatively from 8.00 ± 0.87 to 4.22 ± 0.97 (p = 0.000039), while VAS (leg pain) improved from 8.22 ± 0.83 to 1.67 ± 0.51 (p = 0.000000017) postoperatively. The ODI score improved from 59.78 ± 4.87 to 21.22 ± 2.68 (p < 0.001) indicating statistically significant improvement. Only one patient complained of postoperative unilateral radicular pain, which got relieved with medication over 2 weeks and one patient had cage migration, which was realigned following the same steps of the surgery. MIS-LTLIF represents a novel, minimally invasive modification of the conventional MIS-TLIF technique that facilitates the placement of a large-footprint cage. By combining the advantages of posterior minimally invasive access with the biomechanical benefits of wider-footprint cages, this technique has the potential to bridge the gap between MIS-TLIF and anterior/lateral fusion strategies.

Asian Journal of Neurosurgery
Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University (IN), Stavya Spine Hospital & Research Institute (IN), Synapse (Netherlands) (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.