Learning Progress Monitoring in Early Teaching of Philosophy

Philosophy is traditionally studied and practiced by adults. However, UNESCO has promoted the Early Teaching of Philosophy movement to help children develop philosophical thinking. Philosophy for Children (P4C) brings together activities, resources, and processes that vary depending on the aims and approaches of each program’s designers. Despite these variations, several core components remain essential: objectives, topics, pedagogical resources, methodology, and assessments. Analyzing 228 proposals and experiences, this article addresses how to measure the outcomes of this movement and clarifies strategies for assessing children’s philosophical learning. Initial findings show that 76.75% of texts do not consider the need, importance, or use of strategies for measuring learning in P4C. To establish appropriate guidelines for early philosophy education proposals, we analyze those that include such strategies. Two main approaches were identified: a quantitative approach, focused on identifying figures that represent the philosophical progress of the participants, and a qualitative approach, which addresses the different moments of philosophical dialogue with children. This article concludes that monitoring children’s philosophical development in a Community of Inquiry benefits from a combination of quantitative and qualitative strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Early Childhood Learning
Published
2026-07-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7939/cgp/a141
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning Progress Monitoring in Early Teaching of Philosophy

María Rodríguez-toro
The International Journal of Early Childhood Learning
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Learning Progress Monitoring in Early Teaching of Philosophy

María Rodríguez-toro
article en

Abstract

Philosophy is traditionally studied and practiced by adults. However, UNESCO has promoted the Early Teaching of Philosophy movement to help children develop philosophical thinking. Philosophy for Children (P4C) brings together activities, resources, and processes that vary depending on the aims and approaches of each program’s designers. Despite these variations, several core components remain essential: objectives, topics, pedagogical resources, methodology, and assessments. Analyzing 228 proposals and experiences, this article addresses how to measure the outcomes of this movement and clarifies strategies for assessing children’s philosophical learning. Initial findings show that 76.75% of texts do not consider the need, importance, or use of strategies for measuring learning in P4C. To establish appropriate guidelines for early philosophy education proposals, we analyze those that include such strategies. Two main approaches were identified: a quantitative approach, focused on identifying figures that represent the philosophical progress of the participants, and a qualitative approach, which addresses the different moments of philosophical dialogue with children. This article concludes that monitoring children’s philosophical development in a Community of Inquiry benefits from a combination of quantitative and qualitative strategies.

The International Journal of Early Childhood Learning
Universidad Católica Andrés Bello (VE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.